Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defense could pin hopes on insect life..Westerfield Trial Breaking News: BUG EVIDENCE QUESTIONS!!
Union Tribune ^ | July 10, 2002 | Kristen Green

Posted on 07/10/2002 3:17:09 PM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 781-790 next last
To: RnMomof7
Hey!! Watch it with the blasphemy!!! : )
121 posted on 07/10/2002 4:42:23 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
He just got the wrong answer, and probably stuck with it with it, against a lot of pressure.
122 posted on 07/10/2002 4:42:35 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
He didn't mention a plastic mattress cover either....

ROFLOL !!!!!!!!!!

123 posted on 07/10/2002 4:42:37 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
What's PMI?

I could have fun with this, but, instead I will do as I WAS doing during the transcripts. I just tried to condense and transcribe what They said, Nothing more, nothing less.

PMI is POST MORTEM INTERVAL, means the same as TOD (TIME OF DEATH). The interval between when the body died and when if was found.

Dusek objected to the use of TOD, so Feldman had to go with PMI. Since they both mean the same, why the objection? Only reason I can see is the Dusek didn't like the jury linking TIME OF DEATH with the FEB 16TH date. They might realize DWD was in jail at that time.

124 posted on 07/10/2002 4:42:52 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Yep, or he didn't do it at all.
125 posted on 07/10/2002 4:43:15 PM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
was this Feldman's last witness? I didn't hear him rest, but maybe he would hold that back til, GRRRRRR, the 22d.
126 posted on 07/10/2002 4:43:26 PM PDT by fnord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Good one! Does that mean we can say there was not a plastic sheet used to protect a mattress? I think not. We can't say it was or was not used. But any member of mensa would know to protect the mattress.
127 posted on 07/10/2002 4:43:46 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
PLUS, it appears the body had been fridged or frozen and then dumped.

I had wondered about that ,but I thought it would have impacted on the mummification.

128 posted on 07/10/2002 4:44:34 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
"Exactly !!! Maybe a reasonable person could buy a couple of days discrepancy, but we are looking at two weeks after 2/1-2/2."


"SOMEBODY" had that little girl for a long period of time, perhaps alive as well. Now, we KNOW it wasn't Westerfield.


129 posted on 07/10/2002 4:44:59 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
He just got the wrong answer, and probably stuck with it with it, against a lot of pressure.

Yep.....the defense couldn't have asked for anything better, IMO.

The prosecution couldn't attack his credibility and Feldman made a big impression in establishing how Faulkner came to be invloved in the case.

130 posted on 07/10/2002 4:45:07 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
They might realize DWD was in jail at that time.

According to Stealth Ninja Dave page, was arrested on Feb 22. But was under heavy police surveillance prior to that, including GPS attached to his car, so same diff, right?

131 posted on 07/10/2002 4:46:00 PM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
"when did Damon go to the desert?"

What a great question!!!!!

He moves the body, goes to pay phone and calls the old lady to tell her where the body is! Must have used one of those voice changer things. Then trades the van.
132 posted on 07/10/2002 4:46:04 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Will a week be long enough for the prosecution to come up with some "new" evidence against Westerfield? No doubt they'll try...
133 posted on 07/10/2002 4:46:56 PM PDT by HoneyBoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
With regard to issue of body being unavailable, that would be for instance, body being in a bag. YES. Did you see any instance of that? NO. There would have to be a barrier to prevent insects from getting to the body? YES.
F.Y.I. I belive he also specified it could not have been a plastic bag which would have allowed body to decompose and also be very moist not mummified.
134 posted on 07/10/2002 4:47:06 PM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: mommya
So did Feldman say something to that effect? Did he get the 16th - 18th answer?

YES, several times, and again at the end. Dusek tried to prove it only meant the body was there AT LEAST from the 16th, but could have been before.

Feldman went on to show , because of lack of beetle grubs, and that the fly larvae were first generation, that the body was 99.9% positively not there before the 16th.

Dusek recrossed and recrossed, trying to prove variations in weather, rainfall ,etc. could affect the calculations, but it didn't make enough of a difference to matter. ANSWER WAS, the BODY WASN'T THERE UNTIL THE 16th. IF it was covered, as DUSEK tried to prove, IT WOULD HAVE HAD TO HAVE BEEN SEALED IN PLASTIC to have made a difference. THE POLICE at the SCENE stated there was NO INDICATION the body had been WRAPPED in ANYTHING. So Dusek, lost that one too.

135 posted on 07/10/2002 4:47:56 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: fnord
was this Feldman's last witness? I didn't hear him rest, but maybe he would hold that back til, GRRRRRR, the 22d.

It wasn't his last. I think he had to give them something big to chew on for ten days.

I wouldn't be surprised if Big Barb shows up on the 22nd and the lies and games of the swingers surface again to cast even more doubt and introduce the idea of third party culpability

136 posted on 07/10/2002 4:48:33 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: All
I just don't get it - what happened to her? Was she alive all that while? Was she dead when she left home and stored somewhere? It doesn't seem like either one of these scenarios would be easy to pull off alone. You know how they say a secret is really only safe if one person knows it - well maybe someone who knows something in this case will crack one day - and we'll get to know the truth. I can hope - right?
137 posted on 07/10/2002 4:48:40 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
You have mail
138 posted on 07/10/2002 4:48:57 PM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; cyncooper
Okay, so what do you think now, after hearing the bug man testimony? If you still think he's guilty, why do you feel that way?

Not trying to be snotty, just seeking info...

139 posted on 07/10/2002 4:49:02 PM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
"The prosecution couldn't attack his credibility and Feldman made a big impression in establishing how Faulkner came to be invloved in the case."


You betcha! In so many words, he pointed out Dusek didn't want Faulkner's expert testimony. I JUST LOVED IT!!


140 posted on 07/10/2002 4:49:06 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 781-790 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson