Skip to comments.
Official Judicial Watch Complaint against Haliburton and others (Cheney) *FULL DOCUMENT*
JW ^
| 07.10.02
| JW
Posted on 07/10/2002 11:23:45 AM PDT by Registered
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Registered
What is your take on this Reg??
2
posted on
07/10/2002 11:26:51 AM PDT
by
Dog
To: Dog
My take? Larry has a machine that produces these documents!
To: Ben Ficklin
Amen brother!
To: Registered
A word processor can be a dangerous device in the wrong hands.
To: Registered
bump back
To: Registered
Larry Klayman, 0 - 3,756 and counting
To: Phantom Lord
Really! What is with Klayman? His efforts to prove government abuse have been interesting and I've commended him for his work. However, in his attempts to show his non-partisanship, he has written off his base of support. Plus he is now in an area he knows little about and only encourages share holder lawsuits.
The Bush administration obviously shunned him I believe because, they feel it unproductive to getting policies implemented. I think Larry has an ax to grind.
8
posted on
07/10/2002 11:38:45 AM PDT
by
Sigurd
To: Registered
Marker bump: I want to check back to see if any of our legal beagles explain this stuff.
Seems to me it is a change in billing ( from cost-plus to fixed-price contract) that happened.
Previously, there were no 'claims' to account for.
9
posted on
07/10/2002 11:41:15 AM PDT
by
mrsmith
To: Sigurd
Aside from an ax to grind, I think Larry has gone from "important work" that needed and worthy of praise to a man so out of control with his own ego that he has lapsed into a state of mental dillusion.
To: Sigurd
Plus he never wins.
To: Registered
Defendant Richard B. Cheney (Cheney) is currently the Vice-President of the United States, domiciled in the State of Texas or Washington, D.C.
Didn't Cheney's people say that he's from Wyoming so that he and Bush could run together as the P and VP can't be from the same state?
12
posted on
07/10/2002 11:45:03 AM PDT
by
lelio
To: Registered
Thank you for posting this.
I think that we are entitled to allege that "on information and belief," Larry Klayman is nothing but a vexatious litigant.
13
posted on
07/10/2002 11:46:21 AM PDT
by
ned
To: Registered
This story lead the ABC radio news at the top of the hour. Before, Larry Klayman was was labled a "legal bomb thrower". Now he was described by ABC as the head of "a government watchdog group".
I guess it all depends on who's dog your for in the fight. I think Larry is honest and I am going to reserve judgement until I know more.
14
posted on
07/10/2002 11:47:48 AM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Ben Ficklin
Here is the link to the Energy Policy Group lawsuit. Note that there are two exhibits:
A Wash Post Article and a fax from the Sierra Club detailing the White House's attempt to combine the GAO & Sierra Club suits
To: lelio; ned
16
posted on
07/10/2002 11:58:31 AM PDT
by
Dog
To: Registered
When it was first announced that Dick Cheney was going to run for Vice President, the news reported how much of an annual salary that Cheney was going to have to give up, and l looked at that amount, and I said why no one on this earth is worth that much money,and I think that I was right! This corporation crookedness has been going on for a very, very long time, and I think that all of those at the top have been involved, Republicans and Democrats alike. We just have thieves and more thieves. There are just too many to name. Remember the Bush brothers and the Savings and Loan scandal? This has been a way of life for too many of them for too long.
17
posted on
07/10/2002 12:07:01 PM PDT
by
tessalu
To: Nachum
Larry Klayman is achieving the dream of all fair minded, independent, moderate conservatives, to be quoted by the liberal media in some variation of "Even conservative figure X says that conservative Y is [racist, bigotted, homophobic, corrupt, misogynist, narrow minded, heartless, a Nazi, etc., etc.]"
To: Nachum
I guess you and I are in the minority because we are willing to give Klayman the benefit of the doubt.
I'm going to print this thread out for some legal and accounting friends of mine to get their opinions.
19
posted on
07/10/2002 12:11:48 PM PDT
by
LisaFab
To: Registered
Several years back I posted a comment saying that I thought Larry was "GRANDSTANDING". I received many "flames" from fellow Freepers. I still think he is grandstanding. He doesn't seem to win his cases.
20
posted on
07/10/2002 12:20:15 PM PDT
by
Hombre
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson