[FreedominJesusChrist]

It takes integrity to not slander someone's name before all the evidence has come out in court. Ann Coulter is intelligent enough to understand that and I believe that she would be fair enough to hear Judicial Watch's case first, before she blows them off.

[Howlin]

It takes integrity to not slander someone's name before all the evidence has come out in court

I just HAVE to ask you this one last thing: in light of the things that Klayman has been saying these last few days, are you admitting that Larry Klayman has no integrity?

[habs4ever]

Do you understand what his basis for the case is? It is an interpretation of cost plus billing.Big deal.

All he would have to do is reconcile the 10-K's from the SEC with the tax returns from the IRS.So, why hasn't he got that info before he makes the claim that Cheney is liable to be impeached? its a wild claim best left for the fringe.Larry barely knows the law, and now is going to tell all that he undestands cost accounting as well?

Where are the Dems big guns, say David Boies?? I'd think that a bigtime Dem lawyer would salivate at a chance to play partisan hatchet man, if all Larry says is so.

If.

"If" has been the JW motto since 1996.

[deport]

It takes integrity to not slander someone's name before all the evidence has come out in court.

Why don't you tell your buds over at the watch the same thing? You do have buds over don't you?