Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: terilyn
Well, my question is, if Halliburton published this information in 1998/1999, and these dolt plaintiffs bought their stock in 2002, what is THEIR case? Isn't it up to THEM to do the research?
3,118 posted on 07/18/2002 8:25:02 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3113 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
Just to be accurate, one of these poor idiots that Larry conned into being his stooge, bought their stock in November of 2001, the other in February of 2002, and yes, it is their job to do their own research.

Their claim is that the accounting change inflated the stock price for the years after 1998, thus they paid more than they should have and this change is just now being "brought to light" by Larry.

Thus the lie, since the change was disclosed. Apparantly Halliburton failed to send a press release to Larry and Larry King so they must have done something wrong.

It's the world we live in. Everything is somebody elses fault. Lawsuit Larry is dead set on reinforcing that belief.
3,125 posted on 07/18/2002 8:32:20 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3118 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Isn't it up to THEM to do the research?

YEP .. or have a serious talk with their broker

3,148 posted on 07/18/2002 8:39:51 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson