Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: McGavin999; FreedominJesusChrist; goldilucky; Fred Mertz
Well, let's just make sure EVERYBODY sees it!

"While it's aggressive, Halliburton's switch is supported by a 1981 accounting rule because it helps meet accountants' goal of matching revenues with associated costs as they occur, says Douglas R. Carmichael, an accounting professor at Baruch College. Ten of the 15 largest construction companies use the method Halliburton adopted in 1998, says Halliburton CFO Douglas L. Foshee."

Credit goes to deport for the article

2,856 posted on 07/17/2002 7:16:14 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2851 | View Replies ]


To: terilyn
I've been saying that very same thing ever since this thing came out, but (sob) nobody ever listens to me (whine)
2,861 posted on 07/17/2002 7:24:19 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2856 | View Replies ]

To: terilyn
from that same post 2813:

Halliburton must prove to the SEC that its collection estimates were reasonable. "If it looks like they were just fabricating the numbers, that verges on fraud," says J. Edward Ketz, professor of accounting at Penn State University. Foshee says the company has an "extremely sophisticated model" for estimates and that projections were sound.

2,905 posted on 07/17/2002 9:51:59 PM PDT by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2856 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson