Replies

Neither does the majority of this thread. You should be used to it.

If you'd rather, I could post a list of past legal cases for you to read in your spare time? Regardless if they have anything to do with the original article post either.

Call it a post to show how the media can spin any story to make Bush or Cheney look bad vs one that tells the story with facts.

Larry being the master spinner would rather use headline grabbing lines such as the ones posted in the Wolf Blitzer interview. All hype for attention. Attention = money.

The way he throws around accusations on television is extremely unprofessional.

A good judge would smack him for it, (figuratively of course).

Just look at the judge that railed against the attorney that showed up and blabbed on Gretta's show re the dog mauling case.

A professional attorney doesn't try his case in the media by spewing the dem talking points.

I'm surprised you believe this is an acceptable practice. I always gave you credit for being more intelligent than that.

"A professional attorney doesn't try his case in the media by spewing the dem talking points."

And wanting honesty in business is a "dem" talking point? That's new to me.

I've been out of pocket for a few days.

I say, let the chips fall where they may.

If they tumble down on Larry Klayman's head, so be it. But he seems to have the Veep's office referring all calls to Halliburton, and Halliburton's CEO seems to have confirmed JW's point of view.

Halliburton is trying to distance itself from the Veep. I wonder why that is?