[sinkspur]

Judicial Watch is merely representing the interests of these wronged Halliburton shareholders.

Why doesn't Klayman represent the interests of WorldCom shareholders, a much easier target?

Could it be because WorldCom doesn't have an association with a high-visiblity Republican politician?

There are, after all, more WorldCom shareholders than Halliburton shareholders.

You're such a sap, FIJC.

Young and attractive, no doubt, but a sap, nonetheless.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"Why doesn't Klayman represent the interests of WorldCom shareholders, a much easier target?"

Have you ever considered that these WorldCom shareholders obtained lawyers before they could be approached by Judicial Watch? Hmmm...

[Torie]

Sink, Larry's focus is on alleged government corruption, and thus World Com doesn't qualify. Plus why file a lawsuit the costs of which exceed the amount of contributions it generates net of expenses? Is that any way to run a business? One of the beauties of suing Halliburton is that Larry can bootstrap off the simultaneous SEC investigation, and if something juicey pops up, he can move in to take some of the limelight, and if really skillful, the credit. Thus he can keep expenses down, while getting the upside potential. Now that is just good business. Get with the program.