Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: terilyn
"Complain? I am outraged that you believe that Klayman's supporters votes should count for more than those who disagree with him."

I never stated that; you are twisting my words. The simple fact of the matter is that I offered to give you the e-mail address of the webmaster, so that any potential problems with the website, if there are any at all, could be corrected. If you were really interested in change, rather than another lazy complaint against Judicial Watch, you would have agreed to e-mail the webmaster of that site and ask them to correct the problem, if there was really one.

Your refusal to fix the situation is perhaps a dereliction of your own duty.

1,575 posted on 07/13/2002 7:50:31 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1509 | View Replies ]


To: FreedominJesusChrist
The problem was obvious.

If you voted yes, you were allowed to get back in to see the results.

If you voted no, you were not.
1,582 posted on 07/13/2002 7:58:56 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1575 | View Replies ]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
"I never stated that; you are twisting my words"

Really? Let's see...

__________________________________________________

"Most likely because people like you were "Freeping" the poll."

What exactly are "people like you"? People that disagree with this lawsuit? So we shouldn't be allowed to vote?

_______________________________________________

"You can vote in these polls, but I just hope that the people at JW realize this when they view the results."

So you are saying that our vote should count for less, or be discounted because we don't happen to vote the way you or Larry would?

_______________________________________________

"I never said that, you can vote if you want to. The poll just is not accurate because of the number of "Freeps".

You have posted this theory several times even though several people have verified that we were only allowed to "casted" our vote once. No matter how many times you post it, it doesn't make it true.

_________________________________________________

""Second, do you REALLY think that OVER 1500 PEOPLE read this thread and scooted over there late last night just to make this poll look bad???"

"Yes."

Seriously, there were maybe 25-30 posters total on this thread. It's been well established that we could only "casted" our vote once. Next...

___________________________________________________

"Well, since that's not the case, let's go back to the original subject of someone on this thread deliberately posting the link to this poll in order to maliciously sway the results."

Now we're malicious because we dared to vote once in one of Larry's polls?

_________________________________________________

Signed,

A lazy, malicious, complaining derelict.

1,631 posted on 07/13/2002 8:34:50 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1575 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson