Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NittanyLion
No, I don't consider those who disagree disloyal. I myself don't agree with the President on all things, amazing though it may seem to my detractors.

What I see are some people who abandon ship when their pet cause isn't handled the way they wish. That is their privilege, but they are one-issue voters and because of that lose clout with the party.

I look at the sum total of what is being done. Perhaps economic policy isn't as conservative as I would like, but on the other hand military policy is better than I expected. In balance, I have to sick with the guy who is honest about his opinions, even when I don't share all of them, as opposed to someone who is chasing the polls in an obvious grasp for power.

There are two schools of thoughts on this, but I think I have made my position obvious.

1,566 posted on 07/13/2002 1:48:13 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1565 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
I think you've hit on an important issue: context. When Clinton was in office we had it easy here - everyone was against everything he did all the time. That situation no longer exists, and human nature dictates that the most-noticed comments will be those that fit our preconceptions. If Poster A considers Poster B to be a "Bush-loyalist" posts to support A's theory will be noted; others will be disregarded. Or vice versa.
1,567 posted on 07/13/2002 2:27:12 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1566 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson