[Iwo Jima]

When is this thread going to get back on track?

[Miss Marple]

Well, what a good question! I am most willing to go back to the subject.

Have you any further information about Hallibuton's legal movements today? I hope the hammer is falling on LK.

[Amelia]

From earlier in the thread:

To: Howlin; All

I was surfing around the Washington Times today and one article an interesting little tidbit:

The suit says Halliburton and Andersen violated securities laws when they did not disclose and justify the accounting change in a letter to investors. Halliburton's financial statements starting in 1998 do note, however, that it was booking uncollected revenue from cost overruns.

854 posted on 7/11/02 8:06 PM Eastern by Lady In Blue

This Washington Times article suggests that Larry's Lawsuit is baseless.

Meantime, at approximately the same time the lawsuit is filed, Carville and company put out an ad accusing Cheney & Halliburton of "Enron-style accounting practices"....sound familiar?

Did I miss something, or did everyone just decide to "investigate" or "discover" these things all at once?