Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
That was a civil suit. In any event, the "can't" bit was just a conclusion. I don't think it was grounded in anything.
1,194 posted on 07/11/2002 10:10:00 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1190 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
The discussion was whether high crimes and misdemeanors meant asking people to commit perjury. He was never close to impeachment until that story broke.

I'm positive it has to be high crimes while in office.

1,197 posted on 07/11/2002 10:12:16 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1194 | View Replies ]

To: Torie
I don't think it's grounded in anything either; that seems to be the problem, from all that I've read. Gerald Ford said high crimes were whatever the House said it was, but then they ended up deciding that some financial doings that Nixon was accused of -- what was it? -- didn't rise to high crimes.......but it WAS while he was running for his second term.......it may have been something concerning CREEP.
1,203 posted on 07/11/2002 10:15:15 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1194 | View Replies ]

To: Torie
In theory, a convicted murderer can be elected to the office of President of the United States, no?
1,217 posted on 07/11/2002 10:20:53 PM PDT by Quicksilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1194 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson