Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 07/19/2002 11:14:21 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Flame war.



Skip to comments.

Halliburton Responds to Larry Klayman's Supersillyous Suit(My Title)
CBS Market Watch "Big Charts" Web Site ^ | 7/10/2002 | MarketWatch.com

Posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by SierraWasp

12:57PM Halliburton responds to Judicial Watch lawsuit (HAL) by Michael Baron Halliburton (HAL) is off 30 cents, or 2.1 percent, to $13.82, in midday action. The company is out with a press release responding to a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a Washington, D.C.-based legal watchdog group. The suit alleges fraudulent accounting practices at Halliburton took place during the period when current vice president Dick Cheney served as its chairman and CEO. Halliburton called the claims in the suit, "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded." The company continued: "We are working diligently with the SEC to resolve its questions regarding the company's accounting procedures. Halliburton has always followed and will continue to follow guidelines established by the SEC and GAAP, General Accepted Accounting Principles."


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: vpdickcheney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
To: SierraWasp
I hope there's nothing here, and that Cheney is proven to be uninvolved. We sure don't need a scandal on our side of the fence...But, if that turns out to be the case, it will be a very unfortunate situation for Larry Klayman. He will wear tremendous egg on face. Few people will have any faith in him afterwards. And, the opposite is equally true.
201 posted on 07/10/2002 5:28:17 PM PDT by SamBees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Jane, you can't blame me for trying. As I said, I can support that view and it is a credit to those on this thread that I have not (as yet) been flamed for my view.

That said, though I absolutely believe that the VP will be vindicated in plain slight, I agree with GWB that these accounting practices need to be looked into and clarified. I agree that the this is primarily the job of the SEC, but if a private citizen's suit is given judicial merit (which I'm not sure this will be), then so be it.

202 posted on 07/10/2002 5:31:26 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Halliburton is a client.............so let me just say that they're one DAMNED fine company (I know) and Klayman had best shut his freakin' mouth on this one. He's going to wind up looking very, VERY bad in this. There's no "there.......there".

Consider this a warning, Larry. Trust me.

203 posted on 07/10/2002 5:32:22 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bible Baptist Lady Patriot
"All the targets he has to chose from"

This dummy thinks he's like Cassius Clay, ("float like a butterfly, sting like a bee.") and wants to agrandize himself by picking on a REAL man to agrandize his little ole self! Cheney has character and thus worthwhile friends that will help him. That is his power and it will suck all the wind outa that windbag Klayman's tempest in a teapot.

Don't worry, he is setting himself up to be a laughing stock... "BIGTIME!"

204 posted on 07/10/2002 5:34:30 PM PDT by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
What is the "blind squirrel" gambit?

Even a blind squirrel will stumble onto an acorn occasionally.

205 posted on 07/10/2002 5:37:36 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
Yet, I don't remember the press getting too excited over all of Larry's lawsuits against members of the Clinton administration. Surprise, surprise, the press is biased.

The only mention by the propagandists of Larry going after Clinton was by Brian Williams.

But it was on all the usual channels the same media who laughed Larry off in the past.

206 posted on 07/10/2002 5:39:39 PM PDT by Dengar01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
Thanks. I was having a slow brain day!
207 posted on 07/10/2002 5:43:06 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Your replies (162 & 163) were great! I sorta understand some of the one that follows... Well, not really. Opinions are like belly buttons... everbody's got one! (trite, but true)
208 posted on 07/10/2002 5:50:15 PM PDT by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You have any idea who the contact person in Larry's PR office? I notice that there isn't a name on that press release.
209 posted on 07/10/2002 5:57:51 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
No. You can't find any information like that on his web site; no cases won or lost either.
210 posted on 07/10/2002 5:58:45 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
From reading all of these Judicial Watch threads, you sure get the impression that Larry Klayman is the most despised man in Freeperdom. I think that he could almost give Bill Clinton a run for that dubious title.
211 posted on 07/10/2002 6:00:13 PM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
"PhiKappaMom" I apologize for taking your name in vain without flagging you in the reply! I was just being lazy and then to make things worse... I butchered your screen name!!!

Good grief! I'm truly sorry for my unacceptable behavior, especially after enjoying all your excellent replies on this thread! Please forgive me.

Sincerely,

The WaspMan

212 posted on 07/10/2002 6:06:21 PM PDT by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: uncommonsense
For both Fixed Price and Not to Exceed contracts - the cost overruns are absorbed by the contractor. T&M contracts book revenue as you go.

I beg to differ since I spent my entire carrier in the business that Halliburton is in. In the 80's the vast majority of EPC contracts were "cost plus" and yes the client was supposed to absorb the over runs but usually after they were forced to in court. In the late 80's fixed cost projects became the norm but over run charges were written into the contracts as "contingency fees". All overrun claims were considered accounts receivable, unless challenged by the client, and legitimate earnings . In the cases that there were disagreements as to the amount of money being billed for overruns or schedule penalties or incentives the challenged costs were "off the books" until the negotiations were completed. Every project, most by Halliburton, were mega petrochemical complexes with multi-year schedules and strict payment schedules and conditions. At any given time Halliburton had in excess of 20 billion dollars in procurement activities on as many as 100 major projects around the world. In many cases, to meet schedule incentives, it would use its own money to purchase schedule sensitive material and equipment and then bill the client later. There is absolutely NOTHING that Halliburton did that was illegal, immoral, or unethical.

213 posted on 07/10/2002 6:07:51 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
When I first used to watch one Tom Fitton appear on NET's Youngbloods way back in '95, I couldn't help be impressed by his unbearble smugness and pomposity.That Lary would make his the Prez of JW was all the proof to me they belonged in an office above a Little Caesar's in some grotty strip mall.
214 posted on 07/10/2002 6:10:32 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie
Will these do in lieu of spending $44 on Larry's Judicial Watch Secret Official Badge?

Hello? Is Judicial Watch badge official, or is it not? No, your substitutions will not do! ; )

215 posted on 07/10/2002 6:10:47 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
Yet, I don't remember the press getting too excited over all of Larry's lawsuits against members of the Clinton administration. Surprise, surprise, the press is biased.

Right exactly. The liberal presses true colors are showing now, with subtitles on the screen from CNN "Laid Off Workers Respond to Bush" after his address, CNBC having a simliarly biased title after his speech. Klayman was never so high on the media radar during his numerous suits against Clinton's camp, even National Public Radio is talking about Klayman's suit against the VP. What liberal malarky and lies now fill the airways...

216 posted on 07/10/2002 6:14:08 PM PDT by Enlightiator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
I've requested that my birthday present be a Packers aloha shirt. It'll be sooo chic.

I'm green with envy! ;)

217 posted on 07/10/2002 6:15:04 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: SamBees
"And, the opposite is equally true."

But SamBees that's the point! He will stop short and try to settle or something and no one will ever learn a dang thing!!! All he'll have done is a stupid discoloration of an impecable leader that will eventually fade, but for WHAT?

I'll tell you what! Just to try to grab more than his 15 minutes of INFAMY!

Sorry if that's a harsh reply, but that's what Larry's absudimus maximus behavior has created in my mind. He needs some harsh reality and the nation doesn't need his nefarious niggling distraction at this time!!!

Don't misunderstand, none of my irritation is directed at you... only numb-nuts LK! Nothing would make me happier right about now that seeing him getting that "egg facial" on the nightly news for about a month!!!(/rant)

218 posted on 07/10/2002 6:16:54 PM PDT by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: INSENSITIVE GUY
That makes two of us!

I have a rule of thumb about giving money to "public interest" groups like JW - Don't!!!

Going after Clinton seemed like a noble cause at the time, and with each mailing I was tempted to donate money to Klayman, but the solicitations all ended up in the circular file. Why? Because I believed that, in the end, these lawsuits would end up going nowhere, and because I believed that eventually JW would veer off course.

Look no further than the ACLU...
219 posted on 07/10/2002 6:26:17 PM PDT by kdmhcdcfld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Bible Baptist Lady Patriot

LOL.... well don't you remember that he just got back from a week long cruise to the Klayman Islands sometime in the first part of June. The cruise was to 'clean up corruption'. So I guess I'd vote for 'get a life'

220 posted on 07/10/2002 6:26:21 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 3,801-3,815 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson