This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 07/19/2002 11:14:21 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war. |
Posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by SierraWasp
12:57PM Halliburton responds to Judicial Watch lawsuit (HAL) by Michael Baron Halliburton (HAL) is off 30 cents, or 2.1 percent, to $13.82, in midday action. The company is out with a press release responding to a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a Washington, D.C.-based legal watchdog group. The suit alleges fraudulent accounting practices at Halliburton took place during the period when current vice president Dick Cheney served as its chairman and CEO. Halliburton called the claims in the suit, "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded." The company continued: "We are working diligently with the SEC to resolve its questions regarding the company's accounting procedures. Halliburton has always followed and will continue to follow guidelines established by the SEC and GAAP, General Accepted Accounting Principles."
I kind of thought he might.
Unfortunately, the movie "The Flim-Flam Man" did not have a theme song with lyrics.
Show me the posts that show he is a truth-seeker and not an opportunist.
I found his picture.
If Larry Klayman wasn't a truth-seeker, he would be satisfied to just file suits against Democrats and totally ignore scandal and corruption on the part of Republicans.
Remember, when Larry first uncovered the illegal trade missions being delt out by the Commerce Department, Republicans everywhere, and the majority on FR, were 100% behind Klayman.
Now that it turns out that there may be corruption on the Republican side, including our Vice-President, the majority of Republicans have gone after Klayman, viciously attacking his person and the diligent staff of Judicial Watch.
It just goes to show how hypocritical the majority of partisans are in this country.
Anyway, we will see if Cheney is truly guilty of the allegations Klayman has leveled against him. I am sure that Klayman was aware of all the risks he was taking when filing this lawsuit and I am also confident that Klayman knows what he is looking for.
Dick Cheney better watch out and hope that his financial dealings at Halliburton were above reproach.
I sincerely hope Cheney wasn't involved in any corporate shenanigans, however...
And if they were, then what do we do to the 'eww' that has caused the man all the grief?
It is NONE of the IRS' business who contributes to Judicial Watch. Judicial Watch respects the privacy of their donors and complies with the laws of this land. There is no law which would require Judicial Watch to release a list of their donors to the public.
I would like you to name any other conservative non-profit who publishes their list of donors to the public.
Remember, at that time, Larry billed Judicial Watch as a "conservative" group.
Things have changed.
But I believe Larry had lost support around here before he sued Cheney.
All hat, no cowboy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.