Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 07/19/2002 11:14:21 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Flame war.



Skip to comments.

Halliburton Responds to Larry Klayman's Supersillyous Suit(My Title)
CBS Market Watch "Big Charts" Web Site ^ | 7/10/2002 | MarketWatch.com

Posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by SierraWasp

12:57PM Halliburton responds to Judicial Watch lawsuit (HAL) by Michael Baron Halliburton (HAL) is off 30 cents, or 2.1 percent, to $13.82, in midday action. The company is out with a press release responding to a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a Washington, D.C.-based legal watchdog group. The suit alleges fraudulent accounting practices at Halliburton took place during the period when current vice president Dick Cheney served as its chairman and CEO. Halliburton called the claims in the suit, "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded." The company continued: "We are working diligently with the SEC to resolve its questions regarding the company's accounting procedures. Halliburton has always followed and will continue to follow guidelines established by the SEC and GAAP, General Accepted Accounting Principles."


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: vpdickcheney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,341-1,3601,361-1,3801,381-1,400 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
To: NYCVirago
I had heard that they had, but you are probably right on that one. That scandal is way too damaging for both political parties.
1,361 posted on 07/12/2002 10:22:31 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1311 | View Replies]

Comment #1,362 Removed by Moderator

To: one_particular_harbour
"Obviously, it can be done for non-political crimes done during office, but I note some language that would seem to make possible impeachment for felonies, and possibly even misdemeanors committed prior to the office being obtained."

Thank-you. I was pretty sure that a public official could be impeached for crimes committed prior to their election to current public office.

1,363 posted on 07/12/2002 10:24:39 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1324 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
A ridiculously oversimplified or stereotypical representation

http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=cartoonist
1,364 posted on 07/12/2002 10:25:09 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1360 | View Replies]

Comment #1,365 Removed by Moderator

To: SGCOS
Well, we were having some pretty good Constitutional debate before.
1,366 posted on 07/12/2002 10:27:24 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1344 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
You are correct. Thanks for your input, we might not always agree, but it is always welcome.
1,367 posted on 07/12/2002 10:27:59 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1323 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
Don't forget Da Watch Watch:


1,368 posted on 07/12/2002 10:28:40 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1365 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
We already obtained the sound legal advice of One Particular, plus I don't want to drag my good Prof. into this, and if I gave his name, you guys would know what school I attend, so that won't happen.
1,369 posted on 07/12/2002 10:29:10 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1316 | View Replies]

Comment #1,370 Removed by Moderator

To: rdavis84
Thanks for coming onto this thread and adding your thoughtful input.
1,371 posted on 07/12/2002 10:29:59 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1349 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Good morning.... Have you talked to your buds over at the watch to see when the next major announcement is forthcoming? Maybe early next week, the week after, or today? You do have friends over there don't you?
1,372 posted on 07/12/2002 10:30:24 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1363 | View Replies]

To: ned
Yeah? Well why don't you walk over to Walden Pond and spend a year or so there?
1,373 posted on 07/12/2002 10:36:16 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1334 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky; Texasforever
Now, please tell me goldi. Isn't it possible for a civil lawsuit to have criminal elements involved? There seems to be some people here who don't agree.
1,374 posted on 07/12/2002 10:37:58 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1312 | View Replies]

To: deport
Good morning back to you, deport.
1,375 posted on 07/12/2002 10:38:47 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1372 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
"Don't forget Da Watch Watch:"

Amelia, when did you start using all of that ghetto fabulous language?

1,376 posted on 07/12/2002 10:40:02 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1368 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
So you have no friends over at the watch? Now which is it?
1,377 posted on 07/12/2002 10:41:06 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1375 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
"Drawing" is the key word from the definition. I do not draw any cartoons. However, you do realize that you are acknowledging that what I do is "humorous" don't you?

Cartoon Boy is fine however, after the insane post above, one would think you would prefer calling me Kiddie Porn Boy instead...
1,378 posted on 07/12/2002 10:41:32 AM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1360 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist

A guess.. .. Concordia?

What's your buds over at the watch saying about the next big announcement.? Come on Rebeckie, let us in on the gossip.......

1,379 posted on 07/12/2002 10:53:01 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1369 | View Replies]

To: Registered; FreedominJesusChrist
Are you two going to turn the thread back into another personal insult thing, or would either of you like to address the point of my "insane post" above? You seem to have missed it, so I'll restate it:

Do you think it's okay to trash someone else's reputation and make them pay big lawyer fees when there's no evidence against them?

1,380 posted on 07/12/2002 10:56:57 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1378 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,341-1,3601,361-1,3801,381-1,400 ... 3,801-3,815 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson