|
This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
|
Locked on 07/19/2002 11:14:21 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war.
|
Skip to comments.
Halliburton Responds to Larry Klayman's Supersillyous Suit(My Title)
CBS Market Watch "Big Charts" Web Site ^
| 7/10/2002
| MarketWatch.com
Posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by SierraWasp
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,341-1,360, 1,361-1,380, 1,381-1,400 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
To: NYCVirago
I had heard that they had, but you are probably right on that one. That scandal is way too damaging for both political parties.
Comment #1,362 Removed by Moderator
To: one_particular_harbour
"Obviously, it can be done for non-political crimes done during office, but I note some language that would seem to make possible impeachment for felonies, and possibly even misdemeanors committed prior to the office being obtained."Thank-you. I was pretty sure that a public official could be impeached for crimes committed prior to their election to current public office.
To: Amelia
Comment #1,365 Removed by Moderator
To: SGCOS
Well, we were having some pretty good Constitutional debate before.
To: NittanyLion
You are correct. Thanks for your input, we might not always agree, but it is always welcome.
To: one_particular_harbour
Don't forget Da Watch Watch:
To: Catspaw
We already obtained the sound legal advice of One Particular, plus I don't want to drag my good Prof. into this, and if I gave his name, you guys would know what school I attend, so that won't happen.
Comment #1,370 Removed by Moderator
To: rdavis84
Thanks for coming onto this thread and adding your thoughtful input.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Good morning.... Have you talked to your buds over at the watch to see when the next major announcement is forthcoming? Maybe early next week, the week after, or today? You do have friends over there don't you?
To: ned
Yeah? Well why don't you walk over to Walden Pond and spend a year or so there?
To: goldilucky; Texasforever
Now, please tell me goldi. Isn't it possible for a civil lawsuit to have criminal elements involved? There seems to be some people here who don't agree.
To: deport
Good morning back to you, deport.
To: Amelia
"Don't forget Da Watch Watch:"Amelia, when did you start using all of that ghetto fabulous language?
To: FreedominJesusChrist
So you have no friends over at the watch? Now which is it?
To: Amelia
"Drawing" is the key word from the definition. I do not draw any cartoons. However, you do realize that you are acknowledging that what I do is "humorous" don't you?
Cartoon Boy is fine however, after the insane post above, one would think you would prefer calling me Kiddie Porn Boy instead...
To: FreedominJesusChrist
you guys would know what school I attend,
A guess.. .. Concordia?
What's your buds over at the watch saying about the next big announcement.? Come on Rebeckie, let us in on the gossip.......
To: Registered; FreedominJesusChrist
Are you two going to turn the thread back into another personal insult thing, or would either of you like to address the point of
my "insane post" above? You seem to have missed it, so I'll restate it:
Do you think it's okay to trash someone else's reputation and make them pay big lawyer fees when there's no evidence against them?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,341-1,360, 1,361-1,380, 1,381-1,400 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson