To: oline
"But I am annoyed by Catholics that don't want to see that this "priest" was a active homosexual."
What evidence is there that he was an "active" homosexual? Certainly nothing you've posted.
33 posted on
07/10/2002 11:03:29 AM PDT by
narses
To: narses
Let me clarify what I said he was "active in the homosexual community". Yes, that is completely not the same thing that I wrote - I apologize. And I didn't mean to prove that he was actively having sex with men. But I was hoping that my post might give some one a chance to see what others have writtn about Judge. Some of the old people in my parish and in my family find it very hard to understand and, in general believe what is going on (re: the current scandals and liberalization) in the church because it *is* so perverse -- they're in denial -- is all I can come up with.
I just don't understand the feeling on this thread -- this support for a homosexual priest, chaste or not they don't belong in the church --- granted what he did on 9/11 was heroic but like Dreher said -- let God sort it out and I pray that Judge is not canonized because there will always be the spectre of homosexuality around him.
I'll just leave this thread now so I'm less "annoyed" - I don't mean to insult anyone because I recognize your name and others from other Catholic threads and I do always enjoy the Catholic threads and your posts at FR.
In fact, FR has given me a lot of hope that there are even more faithful Catholics out there than I thought.
36 posted on
07/10/2002 1:11:34 PM PDT by
oline
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson