Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Al B.
I'm not familiar enough with the subject to pass judgement on the research itself. I do take exception to "cherry picking" data points in order to advance an agenda. It's a favorite tactic of the liberals, and one we'd do well to avoid, IMHO.
80 posted on 07/11/2002 10:51:17 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
I do take exception to "cherry picking" data points in order to advance an agenda. It's a favorite tactic of the liberals, and one we'd do well to avoid, IMHO.

In this case, unfortunately, the agenda and cherry-picking  are the property of Merck.  The original news story on this "study" was done by a writer who admitted to me that he got some of his data from Merck.  He also relied on information in a Merck press release about a licensing agreement on a new class of schizophrenia drugs they are working on that impact cannabinoid receptors.  This study is just another piece of pre-marketing propaganda to help Merck make their case for this new class drugs to treat schizophrenia.

81 posted on 07/11/2002 11:00:22 AM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson