I agree with that. I think what set folks here so wrong, other than the fact that he aparently never completes, much less wins, a case, is the fact that he came right out of the gate assuming Bush was corrupt....with no proof at all. Now, if there WAS corruption, that's one thing; but to those of us here, who ARE politically savvy and smell corruption a mile down the road, Klayman started accusing Bush of stuff where there wasn't "any there there."
That's why we end up with press releases like these and the threads that accompany them. If you don't agree, take a look at dead's thread from tonight.
For what it's worth, the one that put me over the edge was the attack on Laura Bush. No matter how he dressed it up, it was a cheap shot to gain himself some publicity.
The only thing that hasn't occurred to Klayman is that, other than FR, nobody even knows who he is.
I don't know whether or not he knows it, but that's probably true. I don't see that as his fault, though, after the decade of corruption Hell we've been through, his name should have been a household name.