Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY SUED PERSONALLY FOR ALLEGED STOCK FRAUD(By Judicial Watch)
Judicial Watch ^ | 7/10/02 | Judicial Watch

Posted on 07/09/2002 4:44:40 PM PDT by Paul_E_Ester

VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY SUED PERSONALLY FOR ALLEGED STOCK FRAUD

Alleged Fraudulent Accounting Practices Occurred At Halliburton

PRESS CONFERENCE
Date: July 10, 2002
Time: 9:00 A.M.
Location: Sheraton Hotel Parlor 1, 495 Brickell Ave Miami, FL

(Washington, D.C.) Judicial Watch, the group that investigates and prosecutes corruption by government officials, announced today that it is filing a shareholders suit in Dallas, Texas, against Vice President Dick Cheney and the other involved directors of Halliburton, as well as Halliburton itself, for alleged fraudulent accounting practices which resulted in the overvaluation of the company’s shares, thereby deceiving investors and others.

The suit comes one day after President George W. Bush, who himself is enmeshed in allegations of insider trading when he was an executive, who sat on the audit committee of Harken Energy Company, announced a “plan” to crack down on corporate fraud. Ironically, it would appear that the President’s rush to propose more regulation of private industry is intended to deflect attention away from his and his Vice President’s own alleged improper business practices. President Bush has maintained that he was cleared by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Others have countered that the head of the agency was then an appointee of his father, President George H.W.Bush.

President Clinton and the Democratic Party used a similar gambit when they were caught taking money illegally from foreign donors, including the Communist Chinese. Instead of prosecuting vigorously the Clintons and other guilty politicians, new campaign finance laws were proposed to deflect attention away from alleged crimes.

“Whether it is the Enron, Arthur Andersen, Global Crossing, or now the Halliburton and Harken scandals, there is a dangerous intersection between politicians of all stripes, Democrat and Republican, attempting to feed at the trough of business greed. As is true of the Clinton scandals, the American people cannot look the other way just because the President and Vice President are allegedly involved. Indeed, Judicial Watch has already sued Democrat and Republican officials in the Enron and Global Crossing scandals. To look the other way for the Vice President would be to set a precedent that the Washington elite are above the law. This cannot be permitted if our democracy is to survive,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.

In 1995 Halliburton was prosecuted and forced to plead guilty to trading with Libya, a terrorist state on the U.S. watch list.

A press conference will be held in Miami at 9:00 A.M. at the Sheraton Hotel at 495 Brickell Avenue to announce and detail this suit.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 841-846 next last
To: Clara Lou
Or maybe they live in the same trailer park.

Yep......probably share the computer down at the rec room.

781 posted on 07/10/2002 7:49:45 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies]

To: sauropod; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
I have watched Keyes for a number of years. He has plenty of insight IMNSHO. Dunno how that can be interpreted any other way. Did u not watch his show on PMSNBC?

Returned serve. Ball's in your court. 'Pod

As the umpire, I am obliged to inform you that your ball is in the net. 'ned

782 posted on 07/10/2002 7:49:47 AM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Glad my screen name doesn't conjure up images from the Beverly Hillbillies ;-)
783 posted on 07/10/2002 7:52:42 AM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Can I put my twelve-pack in your fridge, the one on your front porch? Mine is on the fritz.
784 posted on 07/10/2002 7:54:24 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 783 | View Replies]

To: All
Good morning, all.

Unlike many of you, I enjoyed a peaceful sleep. I'm sorry that I left so early, but I just couldn't stand all the fighting. I'm just too sensitive for this kind of thing, I guess.

785 posted on 07/10/2002 7:54:33 AM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 782 | View Replies]

To: ned
I'm just too sensitive for this kind of thing, I guess.

Uh-oh....maybe you better not hang around here.

786 posted on 07/10/2002 7:57:05 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 785 | View Replies]

To: ned
A "sensitive" umpire. How sweet. You must be European.
787 posted on 07/10/2002 7:58:57 AM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 785 | View Replies]

To: ned
I noticed the headline from Retuers calling Judcial Watch a "Public Interest" Law firm. I guess when they file lawsuits against Republcans they lose their "Conservative Law Firm" status. ROFLOL, get a life JW.

From Reuters DNC Propaganda Machine:

"Public interest law firm Judicial Watch said on July 9, 2002 that it would file a shareholder lawsuit alleging Vice President Dick Cheney and the company he ran for five years, Halliburton Co., engaged in accounting fraud."

788 posted on 07/10/2002 8:01:25 AM PDT by The South Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 785 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Fred's typically snappy comeback was If you had half a brain, you'd be a dimwit.
"I'm wounded," she said in response. "but what's your excuse?"
789 posted on 07/10/2002 8:14:50 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies]

To: Registered; Southflanknorthpawsis; FreedominJesusChrist; kristinn
Amelia, you need to get out more,

OH, MY!

Do be careful, Registered, isn't that what Southflanknorthpawsis said to FreedominJesusChrist that made kristinn get all upset and ping JimRob?

790 posted on 07/10/2002 8:15:01 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
I wonder why this post doesn't have a "gadfly alert" in front of the mandatory Klayman barf alert.

Judcial Watch is a proven fraud.

tarpon
791 posted on 07/10/2002 8:18:30 AM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan
If the past is any guide to the future, any damage done to Cheney will probably be at its maximum here at the beginning, with all of the press releases and fanfare. Before long it will just be tangled up with vague images of Larry Klayman, Donato, the FBI files and the occasional whispers about Ron Brown's suicide.

Let the audit of Judicial Watch go forward.

792 posted on 07/10/2002 8:19:21 AM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Hey, how did you guys find an unbroken chair in this place, anyway?
793 posted on 07/10/2002 8:21:17 AM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies]

To: ned
Titanium, baby. Expensive, but tough. ;-)
794 posted on 07/10/2002 8:46:31 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 793 | View Replies]

To: Paul_E_Ester
What would this country do without Judicial Watch fighting for "truth" & "justice"? Sue happy Klayman and his merry band of idiots are certainly amusing if nothing else.
795 posted on 07/10/2002 9:03:32 AM PDT by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
Larry Clymer is very annoying. Kind of like gum on your shoe - won't go away.......

Cheers, CC :)

796 posted on 07/10/2002 9:15:51 AM PDT by CheneyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Glad my screen name doesn't conjure up images from the Beverly Hillbillies ;-)

Me too.

Cheers, CC :)

797 posted on 07/10/2002 9:17:15 AM PDT by CheneyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 783 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
"You know I honestly don't remember why except that she was probably involved in some issues at the time the graphic was done. BTW, I didn't make it and didn't choose the names. A friend gave it to me and I decided to use it. I think it has outlived its relativity now and I actually would rather not have anything associated with the original maker on my profile page. I think I'll remove it."

South,

You simply do not know what you are talking about. I wasn't involved with the creation of that graphic at all and knew nothing about it. You are just unwilling to admit that it was very unfair to stick me in there. But then again, that is your usual tactic.

Glad to see that you took that lame graphic off your homepage, it was a wise decision on your part.

798 posted on 07/10/2002 9:44:50 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 772 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou; one_particular_harbour
"Sure I do. Instead of reading your textbooks for next semester from cover to cover (as you told us), you need to live a little. It's not healthy for a young girl to stay indoors with a computer day and night."

And nor is it surprising that you believe South's statements to be appropriate to the debate at hand.

You are as pathetic as South is.

799 posted on 07/10/2002 9:46:28 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
See post #798
800 posted on 07/10/2002 9:47:11 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 841-846 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson