Skip to comments.
VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY SUED PERSONALLY FOR ALLEGED STOCK FRAUD(By Judicial Watch)
Judicial Watch ^
| 7/10/02
| Judicial Watch
Posted on 07/09/2002 4:44:40 PM PDT by Paul_E_Ester
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780, 781-800, 801-820 ... 841-846 next last
To: Clara Lou
Or maybe they live in the same trailer park.Yep......probably share the computer down at the rec room.
To: sauropod; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
I have watched Keyes for a number of years. He has plenty of insight IMNSHO. Dunno how that can be interpreted any other way. Did u not watch his show on PMSNBC? Returned serve. Ball's in your court. 'Pod
As the umpire, I am obliged to inform you that your ball is in the net. 'ned
782
posted on
07/10/2002 7:49:47 AM PDT
by
ned
To: Fred Mertz
Glad my screen name doesn't conjure up images from the Beverly Hillbillies ;-)
To: Registered
Can I put my twelve-pack in your fridge, the one on your front porch? Mine is on the fritz.
To: All
Good morning, all.
Unlike many of you, I enjoyed a peaceful sleep. I'm sorry that I left so early, but I just couldn't stand all the fighting. I'm just too sensitive for this kind of thing, I guess.
785
posted on
07/10/2002 7:54:33 AM PDT
by
ned
To: ned
I'm just too sensitive for this kind of thing, I guess.Uh-oh....maybe you better not hang around here.
To: ned
A "sensitive" umpire. How sweet. You must be European.
To: ned
I noticed the headline from Retuers calling Judcial Watch a "Public Interest" Law firm. I guess when they file lawsuits against Republcans they lose their "Conservative Law Firm" status. ROFLOL, get a life JW.
From Reuters DNC Propaganda Machine:
"Public interest law firm Judicial Watch said on July 9, 2002 that it would file a shareholder lawsuit alleging Vice President Dick Cheney and the company he ran for five years, Halliburton Co., engaged in accounting fraud."
To: Fred Mertz
Fred's typically snappy comeback was If you had half a brain, you'd be a dimwit.
"I'm wounded," she said in response. "but what's your excuse?"
To: Registered; Southflanknorthpawsis; FreedominJesusChrist; kristinn
Amelia, you need to get out more,OH, MY!
Do be careful, Registered, isn't that what Southflanknorthpawsis said to FreedominJesusChrist that made kristinn get all upset and ping JimRob?
790
posted on
07/10/2002 8:15:01 AM PDT
by
Amelia
To: Reagan Man
I wonder why this post doesn't have a "gadfly alert" in front of the mandatory Klayman barf alert.
Judcial Watch is a proven fraud.
tarpon
791
posted on
07/10/2002 8:18:30 AM PDT
by
snooker
To: The South Texan
If the past is any guide to the future, any damage done to Cheney will probably be at its maximum here at the beginning, with all of the press releases and fanfare. Before long it will just be tangled up with vague images of Larry Klayman, Donato, the FBI files and the occasional whispers about Ron Brown's suicide.
Let the audit of Judicial Watch go forward.
792
posted on
07/10/2002 8:19:21 AM PDT
by
ned
To: Amelia
Hey, how did you guys find an unbroken chair in this place, anyway?
793
posted on
07/10/2002 8:21:17 AM PDT
by
ned
To: ned
Titanium, baby. Expensive, but tough. ;-)
794
posted on
07/10/2002 8:46:31 AM PDT
by
Amelia
To: Paul_E_Ester
What would this country do without Judicial Watch fighting for "truth" & "justice"? Sue happy Klayman and his merry band of idiots are certainly amusing if nothing else.
To: one_particular_harbour
Larry Clymer is very annoying. Kind of like gum on your shoe - won't go away.......
Cheers, CC :)
To: Registered
Glad my screen name doesn't conjure up images from the Beverly Hillbillies ;-)Me too.
Cheers, CC :)
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
"You know I honestly don't remember why except that she was probably involved in some issues at the time the graphic was done. BTW, I didn't make it and didn't choose the names. A friend gave it to me and I decided to use it. I think it has outlived its relativity now and I actually would rather not have anything associated with the original maker on my profile page. I think I'll remove it."South,
You simply do not know what you are talking about. I wasn't involved with the creation of that graphic at all and knew nothing about it. You are just unwilling to admit that it was very unfair to stick me in there. But then again, that is your usual tactic.
Glad to see that you took that lame graphic off your homepage, it was a wise decision on your part.
To: Clara Lou; one_particular_harbour
"Sure I do. Instead of reading your textbooks for next semester from cover to cover (as you told us), you need to live a little. It's not healthy for a young girl to stay indoors with a computer day and night."And nor is it surprising that you believe South's statements to be appropriate to the debate at hand.
You are as pathetic as South is.
To: Sandy
See post #798
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780, 781-800, 801-820 ... 841-846 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson