Skip to comments.
VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY SUED PERSONALLY FOR ALLEGED STOCK FRAUD(By Judicial Watch)
Judicial Watch ^
| 7/10/02
| Judicial Watch
Posted on 07/09/2002 4:44:40 PM PDT by Paul_E_Ester
VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY SUED PERSONALLY FOR ALLEGED STOCK FRAUD
Alleged Fraudulent Accounting Practices Occurred At Halliburton
PRESS CONFERENCE
Date: July 10, 2002
Time: 9:00 A.M.
Location: Sheraton Hotel Parlor 1, 495 Brickell Ave Miami, FL
(Washington, D.C.) Judicial Watch, the group that investigates and prosecutes corruption by government officials, announced today that it is filing a shareholders suit in Dallas, Texas, against Vice President Dick Cheney and the other involved directors of Halliburton, as well as Halliburton itself, for alleged fraudulent accounting practices which resulted in the overvaluation of the companys shares, thereby deceiving investors and others.
The suit comes one day after President George W. Bush, who himself is enmeshed in allegations of insider trading when he was an executive, who sat on the audit committee of Harken Energy Company, announced a plan to crack down on corporate fraud. Ironically, it would appear that the Presidents rush to propose more regulation of private industry is intended to deflect attention away from his and his Vice Presidents own alleged improper business practices. President Bush has maintained that he was cleared by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Others have countered that the head of the agency was then an appointee of his father, President George H.W.Bush.
President Clinton and the Democratic Party used a similar gambit when they were caught taking money illegally from foreign donors, including the Communist Chinese. Instead of prosecuting vigorously the Clintons and other guilty politicians, new campaign finance laws were proposed to deflect attention away from alleged crimes.
Whether it is the Enron, Arthur Andersen, Global Crossing, or now the Halliburton and Harken scandals, there is a dangerous intersection between politicians of all stripes, Democrat and Republican, attempting to feed at the trough of business greed. As is true of the Clinton scandals, the American people cannot look the other way just because the President and Vice President are allegedly involved. Indeed, Judicial Watch has already sued Democrat and Republican officials in the Enron and Global Crossing scandals. To look the other way for the Vice President would be to set a precedent that the Washington elite are above the law. This cannot be permitted if our democracy is to survive, stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.
In 1995 Halliburton was prosecuted and forced to plead guilty to trading with Libya, a terrorist state on the U.S. watch list.
A press conference will be held in Miami at 9:00 A.M. at the Sheraton Hotel at 495 Brickell Avenue to announce and detail this suit.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720 ... 841-846 next last
To: Fred Mertz
ROTLMAO!!!
Maybe I will, and maybe I won't. I have said many a time now that I don't know whether time will permit. But you seem to be fixated on this, so I'll let you wonder all night.
FYI, some of us actually work for a living, doing something other than swindling suckers out of their money in the name of "justice".
I guess you'll just have to settle your sycophant little mind down for the night, and see what I do in the morning.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
If this suit is not outright dismissed by the presiding judge, Klayman may really be onto something here.
WHY WOULD A SUIT BE DISMISSED IF KLAYMAN HAS THE PROOF HE NEEDS????????
682
posted on
07/09/2002 11:12:07 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
All the snarling and biting on this forum can be truly hilarious, but that graphic South has on her homepage is lame. Y'all can do better than that!
To: Fred Mertz
You know, even back when you were on TV, it was as a second banana to a Cuban...things ain't changed much since then, have they Fred?
I know, you just want to goad me into going so that SOMEONE will be there to hear Larry.
To: Luis Gonzalez; Texasforever; A Citizen Reporter
Have you EVER seen such a statement as this:
If this suit is not outright dismissed by the presiding judge, Klayman may really be onto something here.
685
posted on
07/09/2002 11:13:34 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Luis Gonzalez
Your lazy butt will sleep in until at least 9 am.
I'm a seer. I know.
I will be in the office by 8.
To: agrandis
Did you bother to read why it is there? Do you care about the truth?
Never mind. I already know that answer.
To: RedBloodedAmerican
That may well be. I have no idea who he is. Do you have any evidence he is tied in with the Clintons?
688
posted on
07/09/2002 11:14:54 PM PDT
by
stryker
To: Luis Gonzalez
Make sure you record the exchange for us all to hear on your next FR broadcast. I'm looking forward to listening to you take on Larry! Go Luis GO!
To: Howlin
If this suit is not outright dismissed by the presiding judge, Klayman may really be onto something here. Sounds like,"there is no proof of wrongdoing and that makes an investigation more important". Larry needs adult supervision.
To: Registered
Dear Reggie,
During a debate a few nights ago, you chose not to respond to my questions, instead you mini-opused to me, and asked me not ever to respond to you again. I have honored your request. I would now like to request that you not refer to me in your posts, if you expect me not to respond. Thank you very kindly.
To: Howlin
Okay - that online store worries me! I'm starting to feel a headind in my opinion of JW.
To: Fred Mertz
He's claiming he has to work now, maybe we should start a fundraiser for that too. We've already got his hotel covered.
To: agrandis
Doncha like the badge? LOL.
694
posted on
07/09/2002 11:18:04 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: agrandis
All the snarling and biting on this forum can be truly hilarious, but that graphic South has on her homepage is lame. Y'all can do better than that!That was originally Registered's graphic. Next time you bump into him, you can tell him you think it was lame.
To: Texasforever
It sounds to me like the groundwork for saying "That judge wouldn't let me try my case."
696
posted on
07/09/2002 11:18:49 PM PDT
by
Howlin
Comment #697 Removed by Moderator
To: one_particular_harbour
I just like the badge. I can just see Larry flipping it out right now!
698
posted on
07/09/2002 11:20:21 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: A Citizen Reporter
Don't let your head get so fat. Do you actually think people read your comments?
In other words, I don't know what you're talking about nor do I care to.
To: Howlin
"That judge wouldn't let me try my case." That is the last line of every suit he files.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720 ... 841-846 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson