Skip to comments.
VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY SUED PERSONALLY FOR ALLEGED STOCK FRAUD(By Judicial Watch)
Judicial Watch ^
| 7/10/02
| Judicial Watch
Posted on 07/09/2002 4:44:40 PM PDT by Paul_E_Ester
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 841-846 next last
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Even if Registered did do something like this, if you did not appreciate it, you shouldn't do it back.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
I believe that is what they're trying to do. I have faith that they are doing the right thing.
And I believe that you do.. I truly think you are a good guy with good intentions. BUT, you have to see the other side of things here..
Forget everything in the past.. all the failures.. whatever.
He slandered Cheney (and that's what it is till he proves it in a court of law) on the day Bush delivered a speech about corporate responsibility.. Right before the election.. Broken by the NYT.
From here, without proof
It looks allot like Klayman is open to the highest bidder.
If Cheney is dirty I will be the first one to call for him to step down.. But coming from LK and all other factors taken into consideration it really looks like a smear.. and a calculated one at that.
642
posted on
07/09/2002 10:52:23 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Your profile page really sucks.
To: Jhoffa_
Yes, but they are also filing a civil suit. If this suit is not outright dismissed by the presiding judge, Klayman may really be onto something here. I believe that he is.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Judicial Watch is only trashed by people who do not like consistency.Take a look at this very thread. Look how many people posted on this very thread that they think JW is a joke.
Now look at how many people DEFENDED JW.
Are all the rest of us liars and Klayman haters? How can this many of us be wrong and you and about four people be right?
645
posted on
07/09/2002 10:54:53 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Last warning, Beckie.
STOP POSTING TO ME !!!!! I don't want anything to do with your weirdness or crybaby antics.
Comment #647 Removed by Moderator
To: Jhoffa_
Perhaps you should also consider that there is no "Proof" showing that JW is the corrupt criminal enterprise that many here claim it to be. Isn't that a hoot? Actually claiming to need PROOF to show Judicial Watch is corrupt, all the while NOT SHOWING ANY PROOF that the Bush Administration is corrupt, but asking for money to take it to court anyway!
648
posted on
07/09/2002 10:57:11 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
I really do not believe you to be a liar, but I definately you believe that you are a hata. :)
I have never been swayed by popular opinion anway.
Howlin, we have been arguing about this for months now. I don't believe that we will ever see eye to eye on this one.
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Gee, South - even when you're attacked, it's your fault. Funny how that works around here.
To: Fred Mertz
Talk to Registered. He did it.
To: deport
You're kidding about that badge, right?
If not, man, that's sad. Klayman gets a "Galls" police supply catalog and rips off the mindless.
I almost feel sorry for the first idiot to flash this to get out of ticket who ends up in the pokey on a criminal impersonation charge.
To: one_particular_harbour
It makes her look bad regardless of the past. One would assume that she would be above the tactics that she despises.
To: Fred Mertz
Well, you said Cheney shouldn't be worried, so Larry shouldn't either, right?
BTW, Klayman at first claimed that he was fighting the IRS audit so he wouldn't have to release his donor list. If he's so careful with his list, why did he sell it to the RNC people?
654
posted on
07/09/2002 10:59:18 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
I don't remember him claiming that, per se.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
One would assume that she would be above the tactics that she despises.Words to live by, huh, Freedom?
By all means, don't blame Registered for throwing the first punch. Don't blame him for the things he creates. You never do.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
657
posted on
07/09/2002 11:01:00 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
I wasn't around when it happened. This situation is between South, Howlin, and Registered.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Yes, but they are also filing a civil suit. If this suit is not outright dismissed by the presiding judge, Klayman may really be onto something here. I believe that he is.
Okay, maybe.. And maybe this will turn into something big.
BUT, if it's nothing.. If it washes out, then what has Klayman done?
He's hurt us over nothing right before the election and handed the democrats something they couldn't get legitimately.. AN ISSUE.
And for that I am angry..
Now you run along and come back when you have a conviction.
If you do, I will post in all caps in a +4 font. But till then it means nothing, well.. except as a non-issue the democrats can slander us over when they have nothing else.
659
posted on
07/09/2002 11:01:35 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Per se? ROFLMAO.
He said it all right. You just don't want to remember it.
660
posted on
07/09/2002 11:01:50 PM PDT
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 841-846 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson