Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tai_Chung
I have always thought that a war would first go nuclear at sea. Specifcally in the Pacific. The Soviets developed the Backfire bomber and muclear missiles to strike at carriers. The Chinese may also do so.

On the other side of the coin, a carrier battle group can kick a** and take names just about anywhere on Earth. Additionally the US uses combined forces when it sorties.

Definately, keep your powdor dry.

15 posted on 07/09/2002 6:55:24 AM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Citizen Tom Paine
I have always thought that a war would first go nuclear at sea.
Specifcally in the Pacific. The Soviets developed the Backfire
bomber and muclear missiles to strike at carriers. The Chinese may also do so.

They would not need to go nuclear to take out a carrier, nor
use anything so crude as a bomber.

Six Sunburn supersonic antiship missile strikes with
conventional warheads are enough to sink a carrier.
China has already accepted delivery of these from Russia.
The Yakhont supersonic antiship missile is superior to
the Sunburn and on its way to the Chinese arsenal.

I don't think the US will go nuclear first.  Using conventional
warheads, the Chinese can accomplish their first objective
without giving America a nuclear excuse.

And if that isn't enough to give you pause, think
about supercavitating torpedoes, of which we
have none.

88 posted on 07/09/2002 5:44:02 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson