[lews]

-- I read Darwin on Trail (don't remember the author) but couldn't substantiate his claims. Debunking Darwin is an entirely diferent subject from proving the existence of God. --

Darwin on Trial looks at the (flawed) logic behind Darwinism, but, is not, by any means, an exhaustive attempt to imply the designed nature of the universe. Michael Behe's, Darwin's Black Box, is a study of irruducible complexity and might be a good place to start.

[EBUCK]

Darwinistic logic is flawed? Not in my book. But I'll give your source a try. Later for now....

EBUCK

[Virginia-American]

...Michael Behe's, Darwin's Black Box... a good place to start...

Behe has been totally refuted. See this article, where he is shown to have deliberately misquoted a scientist.

The fact that Behe has resorted to this type of lying says all that we need to know about him.

Does anyone have examples of normal scientists misquoting anti-E's?