Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More About the LA Terror Assailant Hadayat (US media, where are you?)
DEBKA ^ | July 7, 2002

Posted on 07/08/2002 9:47:41 AM PDT by Fithal the Wise

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last
To: browardchad
Ladies and Gentlemen, here is the current FBI definition of "Terrorism" (verbatim)

"There is no single, universally accepted, definition of terrorism. Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as “...the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85)"

61 posted on 07/08/2002 11:33:35 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
That's not an Orange County address. Somebody on a thread here yesterday said Hadayet attended the radical Orange County mosque.
62 posted on 07/08/2002 11:36:04 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: bourbon
Well, the American Mercury may eventually have been taken over by crackpots (is it still published, by the way?), but it has a distinguished history. For a long time, it was Mencken's journal.
63 posted on 07/08/2002 11:38:16 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Furthermore (from the FBI):

The FBI further describes terrorism as either domestic or international, depending on the origin, base, and objectives of the terrorists. For purposes of this report, the FBI will use the following definitions: --Domestic terrorism is the unlawful use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual based and operating entirely within the United States or its territories without foreign direction committed against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. --International terrorism involves violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or any state, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or any state. These acts appear to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion, or affect the conduct of a government by assassination or kidnapping. International terrorist acts occur outside the United States or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to coerce or intimidate, or the locale in which the perpetrators operate or seek asylum."

-- Source: http://www.fbi.gov/publications/terror/terror99.pdf

64 posted on 07/08/2002 11:39:59 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: CecilRhodesGhost
Not only is a better definition needed for the alert US public to understand what is, or isn't, terrorism, but a clear ability to manage public fears is also important.

It seems that you would like the public to forget exactly how the events of 9/11 were planned and executed in this country, with the benefit of lax security, runaway immigration, State Department arrogance and government denial of organizational links between terrorists. I would suggest that a far better way to "manage public fears" is not to bury the facts, but to remedy the problems that lead some to a) distrust the FBI and b)to speculate on the connections of the LAX shooter. Otherwise, "calming public fears" will eventually be an impossibility, no matter how good the PR, or how badly the markets perform.

Death and destruction have a way of cutting through lies and cover-ups, no matter how well-intentioned you believe the smokescreen may be.

65 posted on 07/08/2002 11:42:25 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
right. I meant the later incarnation of the Mercury after Willis Carto et al. bought the magazine. sorry for the confusion.

Y'know the Nation has an interesting history too. I believe it was originally a free-market mag. Some libertarians tried to buy it back and return it to its former glory in the Eighties when it was in financial straits.

Magazines...the names stay the same while everything else changes.
66 posted on 07/08/2002 11:43:58 AM PDT by bourbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Dog
i believe the Limo service is called 5 star
67 posted on 07/08/2002 11:49:31 AM PDT by markman46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz; Dog; aristeides; Uncle Bill; glorygirl; honway; B4Ranch; ntrulock; Travis McGee; ...
Is it possible that the Egytptians ALi Mohammed and Zawahiri may have assisted Khalid Mohammed in the US in 1995 to plan the OKC bombing since all three were in the US in 1995 and would have had other connections with each other?

Khalid and ALi Mohammed both were indicted for the 1993 WTC bombing and Khalid is known to have been the implemeter of the 9/1l attacks for Bin Laden and Zawahiri (reported in NY TImes by James Risen in mid June 2002).

Khalid Mohammed left the Philippines (shared an apartment with Ramzi Yousef) in early 1995 to come to the US and OKC after his nephew Ramzi Yousef met with Terry Nichols in the Philippines to plan the OKC bombing. Perhaps Khalid met up with Zawahiri and Ali Mohammed in 1995 when they were all in the US in CA at the same time. We know Ali was with Zawahiri in 1995 in CA and that Khalid and Ali worked on the 1993 WTC attack together. I just wrote an article connecting Khalid Mohammed (and likely Ali Mohammed)to the OKC bombing.

Ali Mohammed wrote Bin Ladens terror training manual and when arrested had documents on how to plant explosives in public buildings.

I just wrote an article also connecting ALi Mohammed with Hayadat and Batouty via Ali Mohammeds work for Egypt Air security. Ali Mohammed was also indicted for setting up AlQaeda cells in the US.

68 posted on 07/08/2002 11:54:18 AM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: browardchad; lawdog
Please see reply #68
69 posted on 07/08/2002 11:55:24 AM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
Zawahiri had 2 fake ID's...

Abu Mohammed

Abu Fatima

70 posted on 07/08/2002 11:57:16 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
Can you ping me to that article you just wrote..
71 posted on 07/08/2002 11:58:08 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: markman46; Dog
i believe the Limo service is called 5 star

Are you sure it wasn't 72 Virgins?

72 posted on 07/08/2002 12:10:09 PM PDT by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
My mistake

A source close to Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Peres' granddaughter was in a different part of the terminal at the time of the attack.

73 posted on 07/08/2002 12:10:09 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
I guess we need to determine what month(s) Zawahiri was in this country. All I have been able to determine so far is that some of the money Zawahiri collected on this trip was used for the bombing of the Egyptian embassy in Pakistan in November 1995.
74 posted on 07/08/2002 12:12:16 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: CecilRhodesGhost
The media and US government recognize that "Terrorism" is a group, not a lone gunman

He wasn't a lone gunman. He belongs to a group that wants us dead.

Consumers are not dumb. All that will occur is the credibility of news sources and the FBI will continue to tank.

75 posted on 07/08/2002 12:14:03 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Would it be terrorism if he killed twenty-two vice two?

By this definition then 9/11 wasn't terrorism. Each act was an isolated incident with none of the terrorists having specific knowledge of the others.

76 posted on 07/08/2002 12:16:14 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
That's not an Orange County address. Somebody on a thread here yesterday said Hadayet attended the radical Orange County mosque.

I didn't see the Orange County reference, but I have a feeling the Orange County mosques all "radical." None other than the infamous Muzammil Siddiqui -- who attended that videotaped rally in D.C. where he condemned the US for the Palestinian's problems -- is the president of Islamic Society of Orange County.

Siddiqui also spoke at National Cathedral Prayer Service for the 9/11 victims.

77 posted on 07/08/2002 12:17:04 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
The thing that gets me about whether it's terrorism or not is this; it was in an airport. When an attack happens in an airport, particularly in an international concourse, it has a ripple effect felt all the way around the world. That's why it is different from an attack on a movie theater or shopping mall. Nobody seems to have picked up on this.

Add to that the islamic supremacist, anti-semitic, anti-american nature of the attack. Add to that the fact that it was NOT a lone gunman, the dude was well connected with the jihadists.

This was pure terror. A suicide-killing with guns instead of a bomb -- probably because guns are easier to come by than bombs here in the US. Calling it anything else is Orwellian doublespeak.

This PC crap may get us all killed!
78 posted on 07/08/2002 12:17:16 PM PDT by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
"There is no single, universally accepted, definition of terrorism. Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as “...the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85)"

Then an attack on Israel on our soil would not meet the above defintion.

79 posted on 07/08/2002 12:18:25 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; Wallaby; Uncle Bill
Response to reply #74 by aristeides:

To find out when Zawahiri was in the US it would be good if we could fi nd the Wall Street Journal article you referenced in reply #47:

A long front-page article on Ali Mohammed in the Wall Street Journal late last year reported that Zawahiri was in California (I don't remember whether it said in '95 or '98) and was accompanied by Ali Mohammed.

The WSJ article may give the dates of when Ali Mohammed escorted Zawahiri in the US.

Uncle Bill and Wallaby, can you help us out with research on this. You guys are the best at this that I know of.

80 posted on 07/08/2002 12:20:55 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson