[dead]

So you think that if Clinton didn't get blow jobs in the Oval Office, Andersen's partners wouldn't have knowingly conspired with Enron officials to hide accounting malfeasance?

You exhibit a childish naiveté and a complete ignorance of the concept of “traditional conservatism,” which embraces individual responsibility.

Here’s a clue. Clinton is solely responsible for Clinton’s crimes. Corrupt CEO’s are solely responsible for their crimes.

Your attempt to blame the actions of corrupt corporate leaders on the prevailing culture is an outright embrace of the liberal excuse-making ethos.

Typical fuzzyheaded liberal logic.

[Howlin]

Your attempt to blame the actions of corrupt corporate leaders on the prevailing culture is an outright embrace of the liberal excuse-making ethos.

Aren't those basically the very words that the Clintons used to described the Reagan/Bush 41 years? Odd that worse corruption would happen under their "reign," isn't it? Especially when you factor in that THEY profited heartily, eve if it was "in kind."

I believe a case can be made that people thought anything was okay during the Clinton administration. After all, Clinton got away with it, didn't he?

[rwfromkansas]

"So you think that if Clinton didn't get blow jobs in the Oval Office, Andersen's partners wouldn't have knowingly conspired with Enron officials to hide accounting malfeasance?"

I am not sure where you got that idea. But, if you honestly think that Bill Clinton's immorality had a positive effect on American morals, please tell.