Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JmyBryan
Good question. Would also like to know the answer. I assume that if you have no other options, your best bet is to get vacinated against the known version and hope it carries over to the modified version. It would be better than doing nothing.
4 posted on 07/07/2002 3:21:50 PM PDT by Ol'Grey Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Ol'Grey Head
Since there's pretty good cross-immunity with different pox viruses --coxpox, monkeypox, smallpox, etc it seems that even if there are genetically altered smallpox, there'd be at least partial immunity with the current vaccine against them.
7 posted on 07/07/2002 3:23:52 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Ol'Grey Head
Search engines accused of bias

By Nick Farrell [28-06-2002]

Google et al provide 'unsafe' advice on vaccination Information found by internet search engines is biased against the vaccination of children, according to a survey. A report published in the Archives of Disease in Childhood journal shows that the top 10 results from popular search site Google all referred to anti-vaccination sites.

Many of them purported to give both sides of the argument, but very few of them did, the BBC reported.

More than 55 per cent of adults with internet access use the web for health information, and some doctors are concerned that official sites run by governments or expert groups have equal status with those set up by people with no medical qualifications.

Researchers from the University of Sydney typed the words 'vaccination' and 'immunisation' into seven search engines, including Google, Yahoo, Lycos and Altavista.

In total, 43 per cent of the links led to anti-vaccination sites, including what the researchers described as "quasi-official" sites with referenced material from medical journals.

Others were personal testimonies, 'back to nature' appeals and sites alleging cover-ups and conspiracies involving doctors, governments and pharmaceutical companies.

Lead researcher Professor Simon Chapman told the BBC: "Many of them referred to the medical literature, but not in a way which was coherent or comprehensive."

He explained that the most disturbing aspect is that a parent going to the web to search out information is going to have a very high probability of arriving at such a site.

"They look authoritative and they have a lot of information, but many of them are really very irresponsible," concluded the professor.

12 posted on 07/07/2002 3:32:48 PM PDT by PatriotReporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson