Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: parsifal
I don't think so at all. If one examines textual theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept realism or conclude that narrativity is capable of intentionality. An abundance of discourses concerning the role of the writer as participant exist. The subject is interpolated into a neodeconstructivist sublimation that includes consciousness as a paradox. But if textual theory holds, we have to choose between dialectic capitalism and poststructural cultural theory.

The same could be said, of course, about the designated hitter rule.

24 posted on 07/07/2002 1:58:50 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill
That depends on which kind of reality you are talking about. Self-reflexive reality loops are real in one sense of the word but unreal if the loops are viewed in a topological contextual analysis. Therefore in a topological and non-topological syntax, one person could be thrown for a loop, or lack of a loop.

And the designated hitter is a perfect example of cross purposeful design theory confluence. Is "national" more American than "american", or is "american" more national than "National." This is simply deja vu all over again. parsy the parser.
37 posted on 07/07/2002 3:31:55 PM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson