[thegreatbeast]

A loser by any other name is still a loser.
A loser is a loser is a loser.

[Izzy Dunne]

Run, Al, Run !!!

[Young Werther]

What does a loser do. In Al's case he's been reading his press clippings which rank him somewhere above Einstein, Newton, and Marilyn vos Savant in IQ! So there's no surprise that after almost 2 years of yearning that he should utter such nonsense.

Run Algore Run! Try that coast to coast thing again.

[glockmeister40]

All the other dems want algore to run in 2004. They know they dont stand a chance in hell of beating bush. After gore gets wiped out in 2004, he'll be dead politically. Big-thighs and the other dems have written off 2004 and are looking to 2008.

[The Electrician]

After reading this and other recent articles, I'm thinking of supporting Gore in the 2004 Democrat primary... Even if it means registering as a Democrat! What a loser - what a fantastic symbol of the Democrat party...

[glc1173@aol.com]

"Gore delivered an extraordinary explanation for why he is not president of the United States. He would "shed the constraint" on him imposed by consultants if he runs in 2004." (Townhall.com)

If he does that, Algore will lose Red Nation even worse than he did in 2000.

At least his consultants told him to shut up somewhat about his loony-left social-issues stances. Let's see him run again - emphasizing that he was the guy who wrote Earth In The Balance only 12 years earlier as a senator!

Algore in his own words, 1992-2000 - including Earth In The Balance

[Polybius]

Democratic despair is that Gore, relying mainly on name identification, may sweep through a foreshortened primary election schedule as a second-chance nominee who may repeat the failures of William Jennings Bryan and Adlai E. Stevenson.

Where can I contribute to the Gore 2004 Campaign Fund?

[GBA]

If Algore runs, he will run against GWB, a popular wartime president. The Dems aren't likely to win, no matter who they choose to run against Bush. Why waste the reputation of someone they do believe will have a chance of winning the presidency until after Bush's last term is over.

The Republicans ran Dole against Clinton, perhaps for the same reason or more likely, because no one else in the Republican party was in position to run for the Republicans. Sad, as it meant 4 more years of Clinton mafia family.

In 2008, the real Democrat contender will step forward and the Republicans would do well to have someone in the que to fight the good fight. But in 2004, Gore is the throw away. If he does well, great (for them, bad for the country). If he doesn't, oh well... They have the built-in excuse of running against a popular war-time president.

Personally, I'm keeping my fingers crossed that the Republicans don't screw up in these next few elections.

[Ditter]

How many electorial votes did gore lose by losing his home state? How many in Fla? Wouldn't wining Tenn have put him over the top?

[crystalk]

Gore would be a sacrificial lamb like Bob Dole, without the latter's wit and genuineness.

If Democrats can do no better than this in 04, they a really a lot more done for than we could have hoped, scraping the bottom of the barrel-(gut) for sure this time.

[Sparkvark]

Same old Gore

Gore is a boob and will always be a boob.

[GVNR]

(Can't resist it!)

"Same Old Gore" =
S O G =
Soggy Armpitted Gore

Think campaign photos...

But seriously folks; just what I wanted..A candidate who stands by his word, yeah right!

[cubreporter]

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn