Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Luther Was Right, Says Bishops Point Man ( Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating )
National Catholic Register ^ | June 30-July 6, 2002 | WAYNE LAUGESEN

Posted on 07/07/2002 7:16:19 AM PDT by narses

 

‘Luther Was Right,’ Says Bishops’ Point Man

National Catholic Register
June 30-July 6, 2002

by WAYNE LAUGESEN
Register Correspondent


WASHINGTON — Bishops are facing unprecedented challenges to their authority in the wake of the sex-abuse scandals. Some of the heat is coming from their own lay commissioner.

At least seven grand juries across the country are focusing on allegations that some Catholic bishops covered up past sexual abuse by priests.

At the same time, Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating is promising to use his unprecedented new position with the U.S. bishops’ conference to help lay people remove bishops who might have looked the other way or transferred known priest-abusers.

Critics of this laity-driven approach warn that it is fundamentally at odds with the hierarchical nature of the Church and could leave the American bishops individually and collectively exposed to overreactions based on unbalanced public opinions.

In explaining to the Register his desire for more lay control over the Church, Keating endorsed the reasoning of Martin Luther, leader of the 16th century Protestant reformation. Keating, a Catholic and former prosecutor and FBI agent, heads a new national review board charged with overseeing the implementation of a national sexual-abuse charter adopted by American bishops.

“Remember, it was Martin Luther who suggested early in his efforts that the lay community get involved in reforming the Church so there would not be a collapse of faith by the faithful,” Keating said, answering critics who say laity boards should not seek removal of bishops.

“Unfortunately, in retrospective, Martin Luther was right,” he said. “Just think what positively could have occurred if lay people in the 16th and 15th centuries had been involved. None of us is a theologian, and every one of us [on the board] recognizes the authority of those who speak for the religious part of the Church. But the human part needs more lay involvement, to make sure these types of calamities don’t occur again.”

Keating’s comments came June 21 after he finished a two-day meeting with three other members appointed to the national review board. Keating was named chairman June 14 after bishops approved a policy charter that Mandates the reporting of all sexual abuse allegations to civil authorities and that will remove from public ministry all priests found to have sexually abused minors, even in the distant past.

Other review board members include Robert Bennett, a lawyer who represented President Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones sex scandal; Justice Ann Burke of the Illinois Court of Appeals; and Michael Bland, a psychologist and former priest who was abused by a priest in his youth and helps the Archdiocese of Chicago counsel other abuse victims.

Keating said the committee of four has decided on seven other potential members and two alternates. They will recommend the appointments to Bishop Wilton Gregory of Belleville, Ill., president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

“These people are geographically diverse. They are all practicing Catholics, and all are independent people not dependent upon the Church in any way for their livelihoods,” Keating said, explaining they would not have to fear financial retribution for their potential actions against bishops. “All are very successful lay people, and there would be no religious members.”

After approving the abuse charter June 14, the U.S. bishops approved norms to submit for approval by the Vatican. The norms establish some aspects of the charter as “particular law” — meaning exclusive to the United States — and would mandate that bishops appoint a laity review board for each American diocese.

“We have two charges,” Keating said. “One is to comprise a report analyzing what each diocese has done to punish and remove the people responsible for this conduct — and that would include prelates — and to examine how this occurred, which of course could include prelates as well. We hope, and what Bishop Gregory hopes, is that the local diocese review boards will consist of tough lay men and women who will examine the role of bishops and clergy, to make sure their mission is to pray, p-r-a-y, and not to prey, p-r-e-y.”

Keating said he was disappointed that the zero-tolerance policy enacted by bishops called only for the removal of “priests and deacons” from public ministry and not bishops.

“I wish the bishops had said all ‘clergymen’ instead of just priests and religious, but I think our charter is broad enough to cover the gamut and I think the independence and tough-mindedeness of laity will take this commission’s actions to the place it needs to go,” Keating said. “It may turn out no prelate was criminally or grossly negligent, but we don’t know yet.”

Pope’s Decision

After Keating spoke publicly about his desire to force culpable bishops to resign or get fired by Pope John Paul II, Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua of Philadelphia said he did not think that was the governor’s new charge.

“Whether a bishop resigns is an issue between that bishop and the Holy Father, not a review board,” Cardinal Bevilacqua told the Register.

As well, no provision exists in Church law for holding bishops accountable to any lay body for alleged failures in the execution of their episcopal duties. Regarding the discipline of bishops for violations of ecclesiastical law, the Code of Canon Law specifically states that no one other than the Pope or the Roman Rota, the Vatican’s court, can pass judgments. Canon 1405 states that the Pope serves as the sole judge of bishops “in penal cases,” while the Roman Rota serves as judge in less grave “contentious cases” involving bishops.

Prominent lay Catholics share Cardinal Bevilacqua’s concerns about Keating’s tough talk about bishops.

Robert Royal, leader of the Faith & Reason Institute in Washington, D.C., said Keating is feeding a misplaced, politically driven desire among a growing number of American Catholics to establish the Church as a democracy, in which popular opinion prevails. The Church is not a democracy, he explained, but a hierarchy that upholds moral standards that often stand in direct confrontation to the demands and desires of today’s secularized pop culture.

“Gov. Keating is suffering from ‘mission creep’ — I don’t see how the removal of bishops, or the targeting of bishops, can be the mandate of laity review boards,” said Royal, who is also a member of the group Catholics for Authentic Reform. (Register executive editor Tom Hoopes is also a member.) “The national bishops’ conference doesn’t have the authority to establish review boards with a mission like what Keating explains. A national conference of bishops cannot legislate for individual bishops. While bishops can agree to voluntarily adhere to national norms they establish for themselves, each bishop remains answerable only to Rome.”

Camille De Blasi, director of the Center for Life Principles in Redmond, Wash., and a member of Catholics for Authentic Reform, also criticized Keating’s comments.

“It’s irresponsible for laymen to go after bishops,” De Blasi said. “Bishops are our leaders. We as faithful have a responsibility to be obedient to them, to love them, to pray for them. That doesn’t mean we don’t point out where we think there have been mistakes and where there needs to be attention, and I hope Keating’s board will do that. However, it’s not the role of a layman to call for any bishop’s resignation. It’s God who calls bishops, not laymen.”

Royal called Keating a “great man” whom he’d like to see serve as vice president or attorney general for the United States. However, he said he’s shocked that Keating called on the wisdom of Martin Luther to justify efforts by the laity to seize more control over the Church.

“It’s not enlightening for a Catholic to cite a Protestant precedent,” Royal argued. “As we know from the history of the Reformation, what starts as reasonable reform, unless it’s kept in strict boundaries, can lead to chaos. I think at the end of the day what we want is not a plebiscite of bishops, not on this issue or other issues. With all due respect to the governor, there’s a ‘Protestantizing’ element in what he’s saying.”

Throughout history, Royal said, the will of the majority would have destroyed Christianity if religious leaders allowed it to prevail.

“When Moses comes down from Sinai and sees Jews worshipping the golden calf, he doesn’t turn around and say ‘Oh, I have to rethink my views on the Ten Commandments.’ And Jesus and Paul encountered all kinds of popular resistance,” Royal said. “There’s a counter-popular element that has to be preserved from whatever the majority is willing to say at any given moment. If we could just take a plebiscite from time to time and have a shifting opinion on what Christianity is, then we wouldn’t need Revelation.”

Death Penalty Dissenter

Other concerns about Keating’s appointment were raised by the group Catholics Against Capital Punishment, which cited 1999 comments by the Oklahoma governor that Pope John Paul II was “wrong” in his teachings against the death penalty. In response to those comments, Archbishop Eusebius Beltran of Oklahoma City issued a public letter of rebuke, saying that “by incorrectly stating the Church’s teaching on capital punishment, he [Keating] does a great disservice to all people.”

Catholics Against Capital Punishment also cited remarks Keating made Jan. 25 at a conference at the University of Chicago, where he commented about his continuing “battle” over capital punishment with Archbishop Beltran and Bishop Edward Slattery of Tulsa, Okla.
“I kind of hide under the bed when they start firing the big guns,” Keating said. “I’m waiting to go to Mass on Sunday and be denounced from the pulpit.”

Keating said he hopes concerns about his tough talk and prosecutorial zeal might be tempered by the fact that Clinton attorney Robert Bennett was among the first three appointments to the board. But Bennett’s appointment has itself raised eyebrows because he boldly defended Clinton in one of the former president’s most-notorious sex scandals.

Although Keating and Bennett haven’t worked together before, the governor said he is a close friend of Bennett’s brother, former Education Secretary William Bennett. Furthermore, Keating taught CCD to Robert Bennett’s daughter.

“One thing the appointment of Robert Bennett says is that we will be fact-driven, and we will not run a pogrom against priests or bishops who did nothing wrong other than, perhaps, exercise poor judgment,” Keating said. “And I think that’s important. Robert Bennett is a tough trial lawyer, a criminal defense attorney. If I had a problem, I’d hire Robert Bennett, too, because he’s very good.”

Keating knows his talk about bringing bishops to justice has stirred a controversy. Years down the road, he said, he hopes the national board will be viewed as a success story for the Catholic Church and other American institutions grappling with sexual abuse involving adults and minors.

“Although it hasn’t resulted in the same level of publicity, we know that other institutions have this problem and in many cases it’s probably worse,” Keating said. “Although most Catholic prelates are wonderful human beings, and most Catholic priests are wonderful and dedicated and conscientious human beings, we will soon have a protocol in place to remove any criminal predators among their ranks. We need to figure out how to do that, and then to the extent that we can be of help to other institutions, we want to do that.”

Wayne Laugesen is based in Boulder, Colorado.


Subscribe Now... Letters to the Editor...About the Register...Send Us News to Cover...Back to Homepage

Copyright © 2000-2001 Circle Media, Inc.    All rights reserved.
Last modified: Thursday September 20, 2001 .

 


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

1 posted on 07/07/2002 7:16:19 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tiki; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Askel5; livius; ...
Ping.
2 posted on 07/07/2002 7:16:41 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses
Other review board members include Robert Bennett, a lawyer who represented President Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones sex scandal; Justice Ann Burke of the Illinois Court of Appeals; and Michael Bland, a psychologist and former priest who was abused by a priest in his youth and helps the Archdiocese of Chicago counsel other abuse victims.

Great, a layman who was DQ'd from being the Attorney General of the United States because of the gifts he took from wealthy friends while Governor of Oklahoma, the impeached and dishraced former President's lawyer, a woman and a "former" priest. And praise for Martin Luther as part of their first public act. Wow.

3 posted on 07/07/2002 7:20:47 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses

The Church is... a hierarchy that upholds moral standards.

Well now, isn't that special... The Church paid big-dollar-hush-money-pay-offs to keep silent people that were sexually abused by priests.

4 posted on 07/07/2002 7:32:32 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses
How's he doing with tracking down John Doe#2? That investigation going well, is it?
5 posted on 07/07/2002 7:43:06 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
Well there goes any respect I had left for Gov. Keating. he should be forced to resign from the commission now. If he can't see his role in a Catholic light he's in the wrong church and certainly doesn't belong on this commission. Luther wrought more havoc on Christianity than anyone since Arius. To endorse him in his position is heresy. Are we, America's Roman Catholics, Lutherans now???
6 posted on 07/07/2002 8:06:15 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
The whole thing disturbs me. Rather than address the root causes, the NCCB hands off the PR issues to this group.
7 posted on 07/07/2002 8:06:40 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
Well he has been too busy encouraging new discriminatory smoking laws in Oklahoma to be bothered with that.
8 posted on 07/07/2002 8:07:07 AM PDT by kcpopps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
"Are we, America's Roman Catholics, Lutherans now???"

Do we divorce in record numbers? Do we use birth control ignoring the rules of our own Church? Do we use "general absolution" in place of confession? Have we taken down the statues, the Communnion Rails, moved the Altar so that the priest looks to the people instead of to God? Have we divorced women handing out the Consecrated Hosts without regards to the State of Grace of the Communicants? Do we stand and ask for the Host in our hand?
9 posted on 07/07/2002 8:10:52 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: narses
Great, a layman who was DQ'd from being the Attorney General of the United States because of the gifts he took from wealthy friends while Governor of Oklahoma, the impeached and dishraced former President's lawyer, a woman and a "former" priest. And praise for Martin Luther as part of their first public act. Wow.

Keating was passed over for being way too independant and unwilling to bow to authority, not because of gifts.
Bennett is probably a mistake.
We certainly wouldn't want a woman of all things or a former priest who had been victimized on the board, they might not be properly servile.

Keating has fired a shot across the bows of the Church by deliberately bringing up Martin Luther, a man of ruthless integrity.
He has stressed that his field of view is the human not the theological.
It seems plain that if corrupt Bishops are not removed, he will call on the laity to sit on their wallets until it is done.

The Holy Father may make and keep any Bishops and Cardinals he wishes, but he may also have to provide total financial support for them. That is the difference between the theological and the human.

So9

10 posted on 07/07/2002 8:25:02 AM PDT by Servant of the Nine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: narses; pgkdan
First of all, lay people are involved in the Church. Maybe they need to be more involved and at different levels, but really, the bishops and the rest of the clergy should have been able to make better decisions on these nutty homo abuse cases. Anyone appointed to a "review board" or commission ought to be an educated Catholic with enough sense NOT to make goofy, political, ideological, public comments. Is Keating running for Pope now? Here's a guy with FBI/ATF informants running wild in White Supremacist cult communities throughout his state, who can't seem to find one guy in a baseball cap seen near the OKC blast site, lecturing to the bishops to clean house? What's that line about people who live in glass houses? What's worse, people who can't rein in abusers or bombers?

Hey, Frank, what's the frequency?

11 posted on 07/07/2002 8:28:21 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
Bennett is a mistake, so is Keating and how can a man who walked out on his pledge to God be accepted as a judge by his former peers? As for the woman, when did the Church decide that putting women in charge of pastoral duties was acceptable? Isn't pruning God's garden a pastoral duty?
12 posted on 07/07/2002 8:28:25 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: narses
A better commission list: Bruskewitz, Fr. Joseph Fessio,
Richard Neuhaus, Ralph McInerny, George Rutler...
13 posted on 07/07/2002 8:34:22 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: narses
Maybe he thinks he's being groomed for the post-W. era GOP.
14 posted on 07/07/2002 8:38:24 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: narses
Do we divorce in record numbers? Do we use birth control ignoring the rules of our own Church? Do we use "general absolution" in place of confession? Have we taken down the statues, the Communnion Rails, moved the Altar so that the priest looks to the people instead of to God? Have we divorced women handing out the Consecrated Hosts without regards to the State of Grace of the Communicants? Do we stand and ask for the Host in our hand?

Yeah, as opposed to serial annullments? Your point?

What is the basis for considering closed confession a sacrament. So we don't use it.

I think there are more Catholics using birth control than you realize.

The last time I looked when taking communion at my church (Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod) we had communion rails. Our pastor handed out the wafers and most people still recieve theirs directly by mouth rather than placed in the hand. Do you still use a common wine cup? Many of ours do...
15 posted on 07/07/2002 8:42:19 AM PDT by Plumrodimus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Plumrodimus
My point was that many, many "catholics" act in the exact manner as do Lutherans. It wasn't meant as a "dig" at the Lutheran Church, but rather a somewhat subtle commentary on the "Lutherization" of the modern American Catholic Church.
16 posted on 07/07/2002 8:46:31 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
I agree but the NCCB won't.
17 posted on 07/07/2002 8:48:40 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: narses
What's ironic is that the bishops do have advisory lay people - Margaret Steinfels of Commonweal and Scott Appleby being two examples. Anyone want a Church run by these types?
18 posted on 07/07/2002 8:52:00 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
"Anyone want a Church run by these types?"

We already have. Sadly.
19 posted on 07/07/2002 8:56:11 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: narses
Ditto.

It seems it may have been a mistake to have a governor, a politician, directing something like this. It needs to be separated from secular political concerns and culture. Particularly from sound-bite/photo-op culture.

20 posted on 07/07/2002 8:58:18 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson