Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tijeras_Slim
As I recall, they never even tested Little Boy. Dropping it on Hiroshima was the test; that's how certain they were that it would work.
10 posted on 07/07/2002 6:33:45 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Timesink
That is correct. The Little Boy device was simple in a physics sense, but difficult in a materials sense (Y-12 in Oak Ridge which was, I believe, the largest roofed structure in the world at its time, was built to enrich uranium by just one method) There were several methods used simultaneously, and it required tons of U238 to produce small quantities of U235. Coupled with this, the gun-design was inefficient, yielding (I think) about 15% of its potential. The High Energy Weapons Archive website is an excellent resource, with a minimum of bias.
12 posted on 07/07/2002 7:08:09 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
They did test the atomic bomb at Trinity Site in southern New Mexico a month before they dropped the bomb on Hiroshima. At that time, they knew little about what would happen there, Edward Teller has been quoted as saying he believed it was even possible the explosion would be so powerful it could ignite the earth's atmosphere -- they did it anyway.
14 posted on 07/07/2002 8:09:20 AM PDT by TiaS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson