To: vannrox
Under this law, the people on this list may be taxed for ten years after they renounced their citizenship. Furthermore. under 8 USC 1182(a)(10)(E)), these persons may not be allowed back into the US for any reason.IMHO, this is much too lenient for these tax cheats and deadbeats.
They oughta be tarred, feathered and sentenced to 20 years hard labor on a chain gang busting big rocks into little pebbles.
To: Willie Green
IMHO, this is much too lenient for these tax cheats and deadbeats. Far be it for people to want to keep more of their own money rather than surrendering it to a federal fascist government.
To: Willie Green
Just come out and say it Willie: you fully support tax slavery. Those people were so honest to the degree that they renounced their citizenship and moved out of the country but you want the United States government to continue taxing them. Oh, excuse me, you don't want the government to tax them you want them thrown in prison for 20 years.
Whatever little credibility you had, you just obliterated.
8 posted on
07/06/2002 8:00:18 PM PDT by
Zon
To: Willie Green
In my opinion, these people would have to be complete fools to stick around and let socialist big government scumbags bend them over and rape them. I admire that they choose not to be surrender monkeys. I hope someday I hit it big enough to have to go looking for safe haven for my money.
To: Willie Green
"IMHO, this is much too lenient for these tax cheats and deadbeats.They oughta be tarred, feathered and sentenced to 20 years hard labor on a chain gang busting big rocks into little pebbles."
No. Actually this would only be appropriate for the people who wrote and enforce the present US tax code. Equality can be defined and debated from several viewpoints. But when 5% pay 52% of the taxes and 50% pay 4% of the taxes, that is not equality. And those who take their money and run should be applauded. It opens the door to freedom wider for us all. As for imprisoning people for avoiding the payment of unjust taxes, that is the kind of thinking that will result in gun barrel solutions. And my guess is that those in the 5% can afford bigger guns and more ammunition.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson