Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: madfly
Liberals are sicko's. For all their high flying retoric, they think nothing of lying, cheating, misrepresenting, falsely accusing, and manipulating. When is someone in the press going to tell it like it really is. If you have to lie, cheat, and spin for a cause your cause isn't worth defending.

What? Do they think this is justifiable? People, especially the press needs to stand up and call them what they are, bald faced liars and cheats.

15 posted on 07/06/2002 9:34:56 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MissAmericanPie
bttt
16 posted on 07/06/2002 10:07:57 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: MissAmericanPie
Liberals are sicko's. For all their high flying retoric, they think nothing of lying, cheating, misrepresenting, falsely accusing, and manipulating. When is someone in the press going to tell it like it really is? If you have to lie, cheat, and spin for a cause your cause isn't worth defending.

Little do you know how true this is. There is a dirty little secret behind all this "anti-cattle" rhetoric and it's all about money, coercion, and your food security.

Who is the biggest investor in Argentinian cattle?

George Soros, and he's not alone.

Would he fund enviro-groups to run around wailing about the "harm" cattle do to shut down domestic production?

In a heartbeat.

Would Georgie poo threaten you with starvation if you don't cave to global governance and pay his price for meat?

That's the plan.

Are there any unintended consequences?

You will note that in all this wailing about the forest fires that there is no talk of grazing. Yet grazing can do a great deal to keep down the underbrush and maintain meadowlands. Without it, meadows are overgrown with brush and trees, the forest stands connect, and the fire rips through unabated. The meadows then repropagate in trees (becuase of the seed) and the meadows are gone for good, and with them their ability to provide cover to protect soils after fire is lost. It leaves an open medium for weeds. The result? Permanent conversion of natural habitat into something incpapble of producing food and fiber.

Is that an environmental impact?

What? Do they think this is justifiable? People, especially the press needs to stand up and call them what they are, bald faced liars and cheats.

Yes they do. The problem is that they are so obsessed with their own guilt for living that they can't see. They are worse than merely liars, they are the tools of the progeny of the very destructive monsters who raped the land from the East Coast in the first place.

Slave Party investors have put BILLIONS into foreign food production. They move food consumers onto the land that once produced making money on the real estate conversions. They control those conversions (in the name of controlling sprawl) so that only their friends can profit. They squeeze on the remaining developable land so that the bank reserves marked to market will rise. They will hold you hostage in slavery spending your every minute paying for your urban hell-holes and when they are done with you, or should you protest, might well watch you starve or die of disease.

That's what the Agenda21 really means.

24 posted on 07/06/2002 10:37:03 AM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson