Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New metal alloy is super strong, easy to cast
Boston Globe ^ | 7/5/2002 14:23 | Peter Svensson, Associated Press

Posted on 07/05/2002 6:20:45 PM PDT by ChadGore

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:07:56 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: RightWhale
Can you smelt it in your garage for example?

I would not do that, no. Nor under the spreading chestnut tree. The 5 gallon furnace [the small one] is capable of raw heat enough to ignite a green tree 20 feet away, and that's if everything is under control.

A lot of people don't realize that molten aluminum casting alloy contains almost as much heat energy as molten steel, due to the silicon content.

Secondary aluminum processing often also requires the removal of magnesium, which is present in extrusion/forging alloys but not in many casting alloys. This is done by adding either chlorine gas or aluminum fluoride salts. It's not something you want to be very close to, especially without proper protective equipment.

-Eric

81 posted on 07/08/2002 9:33:01 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: OBAFGKM
The link claims 250 ksi yield strength and 2% elastic limit. If that's on the level the stuff is way strong and tough as h#ll. It'd be a nightmare trying to machine it.
I've been involved with some development work on zinc casting alloys. If this stuff is as heavily alloyed as I suspect it is, I'd be concerned about.

-Long term mechanical properties.
-Dimensional stability over time.
-Recrystalization over time as a function of temperature.
-Low temperature impact strength.
-Creep (constant rate deformation under constant load at temperature). This may seem like less of a concern than it is, until you try to bolt it to something.

-Eric

82 posted on 07/08/2002 9:42:25 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: fire_eye
Where's the Martensite in your diagram?

I know it has to be there, because I had to drill some out of a broken-off stud in an exhaust manifold with a carbide cutter today...

If I remember right, martensite forms as a result of rapid cooling, and doesn't appear on the "steady state" iron-carbon phase diagram.

-Eric

83 posted on 07/08/2002 9:44:22 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc; fire_eye
If I remember right, martensite forms as a result of rapid cooling, and doesn't appear on the "steady state" iron-carbon phase diagram.

Yes, the equilibrium phase diagram shows those phases which are thermodynamicly stable. As steel is cooled slowly and equilibrium is maintained, austinite transforms to pearlite as carbon precipitates out of the solid solution and forms a "rod" or "parallel-plate" like structure. However, if steel is quenched rapidly, carbon atoms become trapped within the lattice and austinite is transformed to martensite rather than pearlite. Martinsite has a more "needlelike" microstructure when etched and magnified.

84 posted on 07/08/2002 2:41:55 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Have Ruck - Will Travel
Re: the possibilities. I work with inventors and small companies periodically, and a common problem with new capabilities is Marketable Application. It takes brainstorming. You'd be surprised how a genius' brain locks up when asked how his new thing will make money.

FR is about the best brain trust I've seen. If you guys put your heads to a challenge, there is nothing that can stop you.

I know nothing of metals or technology, only marketing and brainstorming. Just food for thought. This is still America, land of opportunity, maybe one of you will find the perfect application for this and get rich. Hope it happens.

85 posted on 07/08/2002 8:04:09 PM PDT by moodyskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: max_rpf
...the result of which is amazingly light but three times tougher than hardened steel of the same thickness, and it's see-through.

Guess we know who Scotty leaked the transparent aluminum to now.

86 posted on 07/08/2002 8:10:55 PM PDT by wattsmag2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: moodyskeptic
You'd be surprised how a genius' brain locks up when asked how his new thing will make money.

That is why we have (insert fanfare here) ENGINEERS!

If you have a widget you don't know what to do with, make sure that you show it to as many engineers as you can (and engineers from as many different fields as you can). Even a description is good, but a finished working widget that they can touch and feel is the best. Chances are one of them will know a killer application for it. If not, it will stay rolling around in his mind until he FINDS an application for it.

87 posted on 07/08/2002 9:16:46 PM PDT by Have Ruck - Will Travel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Have Ruck - Will Travel
You'd be surprised how a genius' brain locks up when asked how his new thing will make money.

That is why we have (insert fanfare here) ENGINEERS!

If you have a widget you don't know what to do with, make sure that you show it to as many engineers as you can (and engineers from as many different fields as you can). Even a description is good, but a finished working widget that they can touch and feel is the best. Chances are one of them will know a killer application for it. If not, it will stay rolling around in his mind until he FINDS an application for it.

People often don't realize there's fundamental differences between scientists and engineers. Scientist play around with the possible, and sometimes don't even seem to recognize the concept of probability. Engineers are all about probabilities: minimizing the chances of undesirable possibilities while maximizing the chances of desirable ones.

Scientists often seem to live in ivory towers as a result. In college, a couple of my science professors were against nuclear power because of what could happen. Not a single one of my engineering professors opposed it, because they knew the probabilities of anything happening when proper safety methods were in place were infinitesimal.

These days we see the same thing with global warming/ozone holes. Scientists are more likely to believe in them than engineers.

-Eric

88 posted on 07/09/2002 5:37:29 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson