Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Helen
Yes, and that wasn't the only source that mentioned "clothing"--not sure what to make of it. More media messups, or something peculiar?

960 posted on 07/05/2002 2:44:49 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 941 | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious
Re: clothing on or not on Danielle, at first when Brenda (or m-i-l) held up what Danielle was last wearing, it was explained as an identical set borrowed from a neighbor. Later, Brenda said she bought two sets of these jammies with the cascading flowers so Danielle and her spend-the-night guests could dress the same when Danielle had sleepovers.

I could understand a vague, "Uh, I don't remember where we got them or when," but a very detailed description of their origin and their purpose seems, again, like way too much detail.

They're good at that, though, aren't they? Putting all the little fine points on things? Maybe it'll seem more believable that way.

If it were me: "Uh, I think they came around 6:00-ish, but I'm not sure."
Damon: "Brenda was in the shower when they arrived. I remember because I could hear the water running upstairs from where I sat playing video games with the boys, while Danielle was hunched over her diary at the table, where she had been for two hours previously. But I could hear the water, I could definitely hear the water."

975 posted on 07/05/2002 3:46:06 PM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 960 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson