To: Helen
That is weird....the whole recovery thing is weird.
On a hunch..they decided to research the area....the stench of the body was strong, per Chris and Karsten.....poplulated dump site...trash all around her...she could be seen from a distance.(Karsten)....yet no one dumps ANY trash there for 27 days....and why wouldn't this dump site be one of the first places one would search?
Why haven't we heard more about the blue blanket that the searches were told to look for?...are these the same blue fibers found on her body??
Feldman's questioning of Chris leads me to believe he will be recalled.
950 posted on
07/05/2002 2:27:08 PM PDT by
Rheo
To: Rheo
The body showing up in the wrong place (it was supposed to be at Glamis) and at the wrong time have saved DW's butt. The case would be a lot cleaner otherwise.
To: Rheo
I was absolutely blown away that the prosecution never finished the wild trip story, finding holes in it (there wasn't much) and trying to show that he went near Dehesa. They seemed to have dropped it after many hours of testimony, like a hot potato.
To: Rheo
Don't forget, Danielle was NUDE when found! OR NOT?
Are there no concrete facts in this case? Doesn't it blow your mind when you can't find any article written ot testimony given the same way twice in a row?
1,015 posted on
07/05/2002 5:01:52 PM PDT by
BARLF
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson