[Two-Bits]

I really don't think the VD(s) have all that much support. It only looks that way because of the bias of the Media. If you notice only two neighbors came forward for the prosecutor, Ms Busybody and Granddaughter/Grandpa which by the way did not say anything negative toward DW. I have not heard anything else from the neighbors with the exception of the two testifying for the Defense. It seems that no one really knew the Van Damns on "purpose" whereas DW seemed to be a good neighbor. I'm sure if there wasn't a gag order there would probably be alot more stuff coming out regarding the VD(s). I'm in San Diego and alot of people do not think that DW is necessarily guilty. In other words, we are waiting for the Prosecutor to prove it. You know the old standyby "innocent before proven guility".

[Jaded]

There were a few neighbors that came forward. Christina Hoeffs (Mrs. Kravitz), Julie Hennes, and a couple to testify about where the RV was or was not on Saturday.

The Grandpa, Keith Sherman was somebody that David knew. His property was where the RV was stored since November 2001. Holly was Keith's granddaughter. Keith was in no way hostile to the defendant. His times seemed to contradict other people's times.

IMO, the most credible witness so far were Mark & Janet Roehr and Mr. Hung and Glennie Nasland. Maybe Garry Harvey. They are not led by the defense or hostile to prosecution. Truth at last.

The problem with the people who actually think he's guilty that we hear about are the vapid ones who are more apt to do online polls and call in radio shows. RR doesn't seem to have an abundance or many for that matter, or callers who think DW might be innocent. Imagine that... spin.