Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paix
Thank you. I think that it's very possible that DW is covering for his son. I have a question. If DW is found not guilty, will they then be able to go after the son?
895 posted on 07/05/2002 8:57:25 AM PDT by IamHD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 830 | View Replies ]


To: IamHD
Neal had an airtight alibi for that night. He was with 8 friends. I think the only thing that David was covering for Neal on was the porn. Or David really had no idea that Neal had it when he told police it was his. We don't know how much they told him the found when he "confessed to it". Also Neal told the police that it wasn't his. So he lied... apparently his mother didn't know that he surfed porn. Think about it, at 18 would you want your mother to know you surf porn? Don't think so, cuz in her eyes you're still a kid.
903 posted on 07/05/2002 9:21:42 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies ]

To: IamHD
It could be his son, or it could be one the party people. (Perhaps inebriated and accidentially killed Danielle with their car.). It's always bothered me that Brenda testified about Danielle & her jumping out to suprise Denise when she initially arrived, and then the story changed to Brenda was in the shower when she arrived. Weird...maybe the dog did it.
926 posted on 07/05/2002 12:44:09 PM PDT by paix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson