[pinz-n-needlez]

I seem to recall hearing it on CTV and commenting, "Boy, is that a ridiculous statement, her eyes would be long gone, even if animal hadn't gotten to her."

The statement about recognizing her from her gaps between her teeth was ridiculous, too, but I don't remember any questioning about that, either, during the trial.

It's amazing to see the holes in the testimony. Just what DID the SDPD think they had on him at the time of arrest, and I don't mean that as a rhetorical question. :-)

An unrolled hose and the word, bleach, on a shopping list are not grounds for a murder trial with the penalty of death. I wouldn't be surprised if some ethical cop slipped Feldman's name to him out of disgust!

[hoosiermama]

wouldn't be surprised if some ethical cop slipped Feldman's name to him out of disgust!
Don't suppose it would have been the "X" of one of BVD friends do you?

[Rheo]

I'm thinking now that the searchers comments were from media articles I read....don't recall searchers testifying.??

[nycgal]

I seem to recall hearing it on CTV...

I'm glad I wasn't the only one who heard it

It's amazing to see the holes in the testimony. Just what DID the SDPD think they had on him at the time of arrest, and I don't mean that as a rhetorical question. :-)

Putting on my tinfoil hat, suppose that someone in power with connections to SDPD or the DA's office, and the swing setters did enough evidence planting so that they could legitimately have grounds for arresting DW, knowing who the actual murderer was but forced to do so to cover up their activities. Sorry for the runon sentence :-)

I wouldn't be surprised if some ethical cop slipped Feldman's name to him out of disgust!

I believe that's exactly what happened.