[Valpal1]

We have the information from police that BRENDA pointed them at DW in a statement she made to police. They then embellished that statememt and used it to obtain a search warrant for DW's house and possessions.

Actually this is only what the defense claims in a motion that was DENIED! We don't actually know if it is a true or fair representation of the warrant affadavits because those are still sealed.

Taking the statement of defense in a DENIED motion as gospel is not a balanced approach. IMO

[Rheo]

thanks for clearing that up...have been wondering where that info came from.

[UCANSEE2]

Taking the statement of defense in a DENIED motion as gospel is not a balanced approach.

Valid claim.

We have an unconfirmed rumor that BRENDA pointed pointed police at DW during a statement she made to them. Defense stated that Police admitted they then embellished that statement and used it to obtain a search warrant for DW's house and possessions. We don't have confirmation as the motion to allow this in court was denied.

Is that a fairer statement of the facts?