Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MizSterious
If he knew that it was animated or fake child porn, he would NOT have led the jurors to believe it was real during opening statement. The jurors could have been told otherwise, but feldman didn't want to admit the product came from his client. If the child porn wasn't "real" the charges would have been thrown out cuz of the SC ruling. So..there is no point in denying it. Feldman told the jurors they'd see child porn and they did.
1,110 posted on 07/05/2002 7:34:21 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1105 | View Replies ]


To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
So now you are saying that Feldman would not have lied in his opening statement, yet you argued before that just because he said that there was no sign of his client in the house, that didn't mean it was true.

I guess you now believe the other part of his opening statemen, that he will produce absolute proof that his client couldn't have placed the body, hmmm?
1,113 posted on 07/05/2002 7:37:00 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies ]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Tell me where he stated it was real. Please. Otherwise, it's just blather.
1,115 posted on 07/05/2002 7:39:18 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies ]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Dusek also led the jury to believe that he would explain how this crime happened in his opening. He didn't.

1,130 posted on 07/05/2002 8:08:10 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson