Posted on 07/03/2002 3:36:43 PM PDT by FresnoDA
One of the earliest articles reports that the party started at 2:30 and was over at 4:00. The impression was given that both doors were found open at 4. Hmmm why was the timeline changed? No the reporters did not mis-understand.
The timeline began to change the first week. In the early articles one said Damon woke up at 1:30, no mention of alarm light.
The Australian article, PAY ATTENTION SLEEPY CAMPERS, stated that Damon was ENTERTAINING SOMEONE AT HOME . Must have overlooked that tid bit.
There were also rumors, on FR and abroad, that perhaps the crime actually occurred in the master bedroom. HMMM. So there is still the possibility that she walked in on daddy and someone. Who is that someone? The local media seemed reluctant, and still does, to print such stories even if they are true.
All this spinning is making me dizzy.
What he "suppressing?" Isn't it enough just to say you disagree with him? You expressed your opinion. He expressed his. He did not say--anywhere that I saw--that your post should be pulled, or that your membership should be threatened. He simply disagreed.
Now, getting threads, messages and memberships pulled--that's what I call suppression. If not opression.
The theory that the parents did it however they did it, individually or as a team needs more meat..more something to back it up. What is the source for the tabloid stories? I mean, who's to say they didn't just make it up?
Danielle was not a "sleep-walker". Damon suggested this as one of the possible "alibis" he put forth on the first day of her disapperance.
We later learn, her sleepwalking was explained and limited to a "potty dance" around the parents bed, signaling she had to go to the bathroom. (By his time, DW was the prime suspect..no need to prove she sleep-walked out of the house.) Yes, Damon was quick to ask a neighbor if he saw Danielle because she "sleep-walked"..THIS was a set-up by Damon, in case the cops didn't buy his other charade of the "open door" and magnet display..Damon had all his bases covered. HE WAS the victim..afterall...yeah, right. Sleepwalking? Hardly.
I don't think Danielle was killed in her bedroom. The dog bed, Layla and the carpet cleaning should all be reexamined. But the carpet is now all replaced, and the walls repainted...whoops!
Looks like Westerfield wasn't the real Clean and Neat Freak...seems like the Van Dams could give this guy some competition there...grins.
sw
"The lynch mob theory" Posted by jameson on Jul-05-02 at 08:45 AM (EST) |
|
as i see it, of course with commentary |
Am reading the post from J...
Where have prosecutors said that DW found himself trapped? I didn't read that in the opening statement at least.. Do you know?
"I see no way he hid in Danielle's closet -" agree
"He had to hear the people in the house - busy house. Finally it is quiet and he grabs Danielle......She puts up NO fight....He takes her to his house, no one sees him - not even Mrs. Kravitz who can't sleep and looks out windows "
Judging from what little we know, one would expect the house to have been quiet at somepoint afte rthe kids went in bed. This theory is he snuck in BEFORE 10pm? Doesn't seem too likely..but I suppose anything is possible. We don't know if she didn't put up a fight..may she was gagged or something..and that's why her teeth got knocked loose and DVD, after a few beers could have been snoozing deeply cuz of it. Drunks tend to sleep deeper..
It's very possible no one saw him carry her.
He may not have taken her to the master bedroom..he could have carried her hairs himself...
I have to go for awhile..will check in later.
As far as I'm concerned, I didn't do it...
Does that seem strange to you? It's normal to me.
Will check in later, thanks. Did you get your coffee yet? You must have by now...your post made me think harder. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.