Posted on 07/03/2002 3:36:43 PM PDT by FresnoDA
David A. Westerfield, 50, is charged with kidnapping and killing 7-year-old Danielle van Dam. He is also charged with misdemeanor possession of child pornography. Prosecutors have said the 80 or so images of child pornography taken from Westerfield's home indicate sexual interest in children.Defense attorneys are trying to show that the defendant is not responsible for the pornographic images -- including those of young children -- found on his computer equipment.
David A. Westerfield, a 50-year-old self-employed design engineer, is on trial for the kidnapping and murder of 7-year-old Danielle van Dam.
Lawson told jurors that he examined copies of hard drives, zip disks and compact disks made by police and took numerous screen captures -- essentially photographs of what came up on the computer monitor at a given time.
Defense attorney Steven Feldman asked Lawson if there was a theme to the animations.
"A considerable number of the screen prints showed bondage -- where women were tied in ropes," Lawson said.
A screen print of an e-mail to a DNWesthotmail.com, as quoted by Lawson, said: "Thanks for joining anime.com."
Lawson also confirmed screen prints the defense entered into evidence last week, that a computer in the office of Westerfield's house was used to access pornography on Feb. 4 at 4:47 p.m., when the defendant was busy with detectives.
Feldman mentioned last week's suggestion that the clock on the computer may have been doctored.
"Did you see any evidence that that happened on any of the computers you examined?" Feldman asked.
"No, I did not," Lawson answered. He said there's usually signs when a clock has been tampered with, such as files being accessed before they were created. Nothing like that was apparent on Westerfield's computers, he said.
Tuesday, San Diego police Detective Johnny Keene testified that he collected Westerfield from his Sabre Springs home that Monday around 3:40 p.m. and took him to the Northeastern substation in Rancho Penasquitos. The defendant remained there until approximately 11:30 p.m.
I'm glad I wasn't the only one who heard it
It's amazing to see the holes in the testimony. Just what DID the SDPD think they had on him at the time of arrest, and I don't mean that as a rhetorical question. :-)
Putting on my tinfoil hat, suppose that someone in power with connections to SDPD or the DA's office, and the swing setters did enough evidence planting so that they could legitimately have grounds for arresting DW, knowing who the actual murderer was but forced to do so to cover up their activities. Sorry for the runon sentence :-)
I wouldn't be surprised if some ethical cop slipped Feldman's name to him out of disgust!
I believe that's exactly what happened.
Chris (don't remember last name) was the one who actually located her body and I can't remember the other searcher's name. One of the first 2 witnesses to testify.
Yeah, something like that. Do you remember Chris's last name?
A. WE WERE TOLD TO LOOK FOR ITEMS THAT COULD POSSIBLY
25 BE SOMETHING FROM DANIELLE OR DANIELLE'S BELONGINGS. I THINK I
26 RECALLED HEARING THEM SAY SOMETHING ABOUT A BLUE BLANKET
They were pretty creepy, IMO, no pun intended.
I wish I could get through the transcripts, as you do so admirably :-) but too much life is careening around here.
I've wondered several times if all that orange fiber couldn't have something to do with what you're speculating here.
DW just didn't seem to try to hide the stuff that came to bite him in the butt. And he was so trusting of LE when guilt should have made him clam up, if he had done it.
There are only two drops of blood and a hair in the MH. But if someone was planting evidence, wouldn't they feel compelled to be a bit more obvious? Like the orange fibers. And Dusek never did explain why they should be connected, did he?
I THOUGHT MAYBE MY PHOTOS COULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE OR COULD POSSIBLY BE CONSIDERED SOMETHING THAT'S HELPFUL. SO I CALLED THE D. A.
Q: DID YOU TURN THEM OVER TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE?
A: NO. HE SHOWED UP AT MY HOUSE I BELIEVE. BUT FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES, YES
Are you suggesting the cop who has the same former name of Barb, who may be her ex?
If that were so, it would explain a lot wouldn't it?
Like how the cops found out about the partying on Friday night, why the Prosecution wouldn't put Barb on the the stand, and why LE had to find a patsy - and quick! All of this is speculation,I don't know that such a connection exists. But it would explain a lot of riddles.
I know you guys know the case well, but I was just answering a post. I hope trial will bring justice. What is your opinion of the judge? It can make a huge difference.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.