To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
not sure if they can connect his son to the child porn though Well, so far it gives me reasonable doubt. If the son was surfing for Teen Porn-- it's not such a stretch for me to think the child porn was Neal's and not DW's.
To: Mrs.O'Strategery
I hear ya....It's not surprising to see teens looking for porn... and it wouldn't surprise me if DW was looking for porn. IMHO, the porn is not the problem..it's the child porn. Trying to link it to the son is dispicable if the son didn't do it.. I'm waiting to see the outcome of this...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson