[Small business person from CA]

Um to whom did Carney say those things. Carney has been talking for years about Sudan , which, though is had never before shown itself friendly or helpful to the US, said it wanted to share some 'information' on bin Laden ,but not that they would hand him over.

Why is Carney just now changing his story on Sudan-bin Laden and to whom? NewsMax does not say. Are they claiming he stood in the shadows Deep Throat like and talked only to them?


I have found many 'mistakes' in NewsMax's reporting and don't trust it. It seems to be written by amateurs who caught some rich people's interest because the 'journalists' there don't worry too much about what is the truth.

[Fred Mertz]

You should stick around longer and learn more. There are numerous other sources which have been covering this story, but mainly on the inner pages below the fold.

[metesky]

Um to whom did Carney say those things?

"In fact, what was offered (by the Sudanese) was to expel bin Laden to Saudi Arabia and the Saudis, because he was such a hot potato, simply refused to handle him," Carney told Fox News Channel's Alan Colmes."

"But Ijaz and Carney may have picked up a powerful new ally last weekend, when Secretary of State Colin Powell seemed to endorse their version of events, which they detailed in a Washington Post op-ed piece on Sunday."

Wazamatta? Cain't read?