Replies

Get a clue. If you want to discuss the specific allegations, have at it. They have been thoroughly aired before, investigated, and there is nothing to them.

The fact that Krugman raised them again, spun them in a way to make look Bush responsible for the wrongdoing in some corporations today, and interjected these tired allegations into the news cycle was a cheap attack by him.

You bet your ass we're going to berate him for it.

Sure, "investigated" as is noted in the article by the SEC while Dad was President. I'm sure it was completely thorough! And if you believe that I've got a bridge in Brooklyn for you. I bet it was significantly less rigourous than the going over Clinton got from a partisan special prosecutor!

What makes me laugh it how much Republicans love to point at how Bush went to Yale, "made it in business" and got an MBA from Harvard when it is constantly being made clear that it was all handed to him because he had the same name as the President. A legacy admission to Yale (meaning his way was paved with gifts to the University), he fails in oil but gets a big buyout, is invited to get in on the Texas Rangers for a few hundred grand (which made him millions) etc. Its been a tough road for George Jr., but that's obviously built up a lot of character!