To: fatima
Thanks.I didn't know that in an opening statement that they could say what they want and not prove it.It would really help if they could because I am lost to how this happened,got in and got out of the house.As others theorized earlier, I believe that they rushed to take this to trial before the fiber, dna, etc. results came back, very sure that they would prove his guilt. Unfortunately for the prosecution things have not worked out as they expected so they're stuck looking like liars. I can only hope that the jury remembers or has taken notes during the opening statement. Whether they did or not, I'm sure Feldman will be only too happy to refresh their memory. That's why DW is paying him the really big bucks :-)
87 posted on
07/02/2002 7:53:39 PM PDT by
nycgal
To: nycgal
The prosecution didn't rush to take this case to trial; the defense requested and obtained an early trial date. This has rushed the prosecution case, which is probably just what the defense wanted to happen.
To: nycgal
Feldman will remind the jury, during closing arguments, of everything Dusek claimed he could prove and systematically show that Dusek failed almost completely. It will be the last thing the jury will hear. That, and 'rush to judgment'.
To: nycgal
Thank you,We pray for the reason this happened to this little girl to be exposed.
194 posted on
07/02/2002 9:07:35 PM PDT by
fatima
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson