The pj's she was supposedly wearing are different from the ones on the floor.
What do you make of this?
I'm not aware of this finding, Rheo (I haven't read *every* post about the crime), but it seems to me, that if the pj's left behind had blood on them, then, uh, they don't pertain to the crime, if I got what you said right. Why would anyone want to change her into clean pj's before obsconding with her leaving the evidence of blood behind? This doesn't make sense to me.
About the blood in the motorhome; it must not have been alot of blood, say, the amount that you'd expect if she were punched in the mouth, and we don't know how long the blood had been there. It's very easy to plant a blood stain that small on clothing and on objects; let's remember that LEO's have the technology to find blood even if the area has been scrubbed down. Does anyone know whether this treatment was done in the MH, or are the blood spots which were found a result of this treatment? It's very possible that Danielle had been in the MH in the past since the door has been open in the past or she might have wandered over to the MH while DW was inside and she was friendly and curious and asked to see what a MH looked like inside and DW let her come in for a moment (I know I'd be curious at that age) and she touched things and left some blood from a small cut on her arm, leg, finger, whatever. (When I was her age there probably wasn't a place on my body without a band-aid.) DW may not have wanted to mention such a short visit for fear that that would be all it takes for the police or jury to convict. Besides, it appears the kids weren't supervised very well and we really don't know whether she'd been in the MH at any time. I know this is a slim chance.
Now, if you were to ask me who I think may have had the opportunity and motive to do such a thing, I'd say the father. He had the most to lose if Danielle talked, if he'd been monkeying around with her as well. We don't know the kind of relationship he had with her and we don't know what his sexual mores are at this time. I think we need to remember that children her age often threaten to "tell on someone" and might have the tendency to taunt a little, like "if I can't go to King's Dominion, I'm going to tellll XXX what you do (to me?). She seems like a very curious, mischevious, spunky kid who might say something like this but I don't believe she'd say "I'm telling Mommy! I'm telling Mommy!" because she's partially aware of what's right and wrong and maybe Mom has said "don't say anything to anyone." If that's not the case, then she might have gotten up late that night and spied on them all and we know the rest. From the get-go the parents behaved in an inappropriate manner for having just had their kid abducted. The father always had the half-smile-look and his taunting in court could be a ruse to convince others how "upset" he is with DW so others won't take a long look at him. Why didn't we see some of this emotion the first days we saw them on TV?
Like I said, something smells.