Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fatima
But I do wonder how it could be done and why they didn't present evidence on how he got in and out.

We all wonder how it could be done by an outsider,who was reportedly very drunk, while the MAN of the house was supposedly HOME, while the dog was there, and without leaving a shred of evidence of his having been there.

OTOH, there was plenty of evidence that other strangers had been in the house, but the police chose to ignore that evidence. There were prints, hairs, etc. from non family members that police did not attempt to identify.

33 posted on 07/02/2002 7:02:38 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
I don't understand this,they gave no evidence that he was in the house but did not test all evidence in the house of other people there and what about her room.
35 posted on 07/02/2002 7:07:34 PM PDT by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2
The LE were just plain stupid! They thought DW was their man and the Van Dams fueled the flames.

By the time serious change of stories by the VD's were brought forth, it was just too late to call the show off, I think.

sw

40 posted on 07/02/2002 7:13:29 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson