[luvbach1]

I can only explain the lack of evidence of his entry and removal of Danielle by the fact that he was careful and succeeding in not leaving evidence. Obviously someone removed her without leaving evidence, so why not him? We don't know how drunk he was,or whether he was drunk, do we? He left the bar/cafe earlier than the others so it's reasonable to assume he drank less. As for Danielle screaming, this would present same difficulty to any other abductor. Brutal as the perp must have been, he could have choked her into unconsciousness befor carrying her out.Again, the proof is that it did happen. You read my previous scenarios so you know the rest (lol).

[John Jamieson]

so why not him?

Why not any of a dozen "convicted" sexual offeners in the area?

Or, the sexually aggressive lezbo, Barbara?

[JusticeLives]

"As for Danielle screaming, this would present same difficulty to any other abductor. Brutal as the perp must have been, he could have choked her into unconsciousness befor carrying her out."

I'm of the opinion that Danielle was punched in the mouth which would explain why some of her front teeth were missing, but not found under the body, and that suggests to me that she was knocked out during the nab (or the other scenarios I've addressed to UCANSEE2 in this thread). IF she was kidnapped it would explain, IMHO, the small amount of blood found in her bedroom. Having said this, I'm still not convinced that a drunk and drugged out DW would be able to be very quiet in that state; quiet enough to abduct a child from her bedroom. H*ll, I don't drink, but when I'm trying to be veeeerrrry quiet, that's when I bump into things, walk into the doorjamb, drop things that clank, etc. etc.

[Yeti]

Obviously someone removed her without leaving evidence, so why not him?

No, the perp left prints on both "alarm-light" doors, the bannister, Danielle's door-frame and her dresser. He/she also left DNA all over her bed.

It's just that the evidence doesn't match DW, so we don't look at it.